From owner-freebsd-hackers  Wed Sep  4 11:19:21 1996
Return-Path: owner-hackers
Received: (from root@localhost)
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.5/8.7.3) id LAA24896
          for hackers-outgoing; Wed, 4 Sep 1996 11:19:21 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from maelstrom.CC.McGill.CA (maelstrom.CC.McGill.CA [132.206.35.2])
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.5/8.7.3) with ESMTP id LAA24889
          for <hackers@FreeBSD.org>; Wed, 4 Sep 1996 11:19:14 -0700 (PDT)
Received: (from yves@localhost) by maelstrom.CC.McGill.CA (8.7.1/8.6.10) id OAA08638 for hackers@FreeBSD.org; Wed, 4 Sep 1996 14:16:09 -0400 (EDT)
Message-Id: <199609041816.OAA08638@maelstrom.CC.McGill.CA>
MIME-Version: 1.0 (NeXT Mail 3.3 v118.2)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Received: by NeXT.Mailer (1.118.2)
From: Yves Lepage <yves@CC.McGill.CA>
Date: Wed,  4 Sep 96 14:16:06 -0400
To: hackers@FreeBSD.org
Subject: Re: FreeBSD vs. Linux 96 (my impressions)
Reply-To: yves@CC.McGill.CA
References: <199609041744.KAA06780@phaeton.artisoft.com>
Sender: owner-hackers@FreeBSD.org
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org
Precedence: bulk

Hi,

I just thought I'd mention that Mike O'Brien in his lastest article in
Sun Expert, mentions FreeBSD and says:

"FreeBSD runs on Intel platforms and provides the what is probably the most
 robust and capable TCP/IP stack in existence..."
 
 That's in the August issue of Sun Expert.
 
 Yves Lepage