Date: Wed, 02 Mar 2011 15:57:47 +0100 From: Michal Varga <varga.michal@gmail.com> To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Cc: gahr@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: gegl Message-ID: <1299077867.52738.5.camel@xenon> In-Reply-To: <4D6E5691.9060906@yandex.ru> References: <201103011706.45759.lumiwa@gmail.com> <20110302075219.GA2182@reindeer.exwg.net> <20110302100645.GB2182@reindeer.exwg.net> <4D6E5691.9060906@yandex.ru>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Wed, 2011-03-02 at 17:39 +0300, Ruslan Mahmatkhanov wrote: > 02.03.2011 13:06, Christoph Moench-Tegeder пишет: > > ## Christoph Moench-Tegeder (cmt@burggraben.net): > > > >> Looks as if we (at least on 8.2) are missing log2(), log2f(), log2l(), > >> even though they are in C99 (partially C89) and POSIX since at least > >> 2008. (I can't find them in math.h, log2l() is commented out). > >> If nobody else does, I might get around to workaround-patching this later > >> today. > > > > There it is: ports/155183 > > Please check the patch there, in case I broke the math (logarithms are > > easy enough, but anyway...). > > > > > > Regards, > > Christoph > > Still doesn't builds for me. > smeshariki2# sysctl kern.osreldate > kern.osreldate: 802500 > > If i change the check on something like: > if __FreeBSD_version < 704000 || (__FreeBSD_version > 800000 && > __FreeBSD_version < 803000) > > then it build fine. > Out of curiosity - how is it even possible that this update made it as far as into ports tree, when it - at least as I understand from the PR - clearly doesn't work on *both* *STABLE* *supported* branches and only goes well with the very latest CURRENT? Wouldn't a single test run on either 7.x or 8.x before committing the port reveal this issue? Just my thoughts. m. -- Michal Varga, Stonehenge (Gmail account)
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?1299077867.52738.5.camel>