From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Sep 9 20:36:59 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 62C2F106568B for ; Tue, 9 Sep 2008 20:36:59 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd-current@m.gmane.org) Received: from ciao.gmane.org (main.gmane.org [80.91.229.2]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2104B8FC2E for ; Tue, 9 Sep 2008 20:36:58 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd-current@m.gmane.org) Received: from list by ciao.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.43) id 1Kd9xE-00075G-N5 for freebsd-current@freebsd.org; Tue, 09 Sep 2008 20:36:52 +0000 Received: from 91-64-168-90-dynip.superkabel.de ([91.64.168.90]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Tue, 09 Sep 2008 20:36:52 +0000 Received: from ino-news by 91-64-168-90-dynip.superkabel.de with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Tue, 09 Sep 2008 20:36:52 +0000 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org From: clemens fischer Date: Tue, 09 Sep 2008 22:36:36 +0200 Lines: 14 Message-ID: References: <200809021033.55033.jhb@freebsd.org> <200809081650.38774.jhb@freebsd.org> <7d6fde3d0809082027k5a5c9d7fm5eceb48e1a68612f@mail.gmail.com> X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: 91-64-168-90-dynip.superkabel.de X-Archive: encrypt=none User-Agent: tin/1.8.3-20070201 ("Scotasay") (UNIX) (FreeBSD/8.0-CURRENT (i386)) Sender: news Subject: Re: No root filesystem X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 09 Sep 2008 20:36:59 -0000 On Tue, 9 Sep 2008 08:49:00 +0200 Pascal Hofstee wrote: > Seems that the actual file is > http://people.freebsd.org/~jhb/patches/pci_mcfg_k8.patch I tried the patch, but it doesn't give me back device="Athlon 64/Opteron Miscellaneous Control", which is the basis for using the ports k8temp. otherwise, the patch didn't broke anything else. i am actually running i386 on an AMD K8, 8.0-CURRENT #0 r182890M. btw, why isn't sys/modules/k8temp available for i386? -c