From owner-dev-commits-ports-all@freebsd.org Thu Apr 22 10:46:54 2021 Return-Path: Delivered-To: dev-commits-ports-all@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 738FA5EAB5C; Thu, 22 Apr 2021 10:46:54 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from danfe@freebsd.org) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.freebsd.org [96.47.72.132]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256 client-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "freefall.freebsd.org", Issuer "R3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4FQvHf2ttVz3jBH; Thu, 22 Apr 2021 10:46:54 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from danfe@freebsd.org) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=freebsd.org; s=dkim; t=1619088414; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=fvU0zK9u7q4yftvThacfvAZNt9SYKVuFZzLNEa97F5g=; b=EsB7jOvDfbCkoMNMywP/Ocz4TUPxEw0RMNCL78+7UyegBscjv0Np1LzlBwoYYo66mg2tsp DMILwY+VSBn2ZLdV9jne1vLO745JyW2i/iFMMItCIVO2UL2ugmardbZ9SNDNfpYpsjh9Dv 4/VMUAvH/rW5ULGTpigWYhccsGqjBb5VyCu6rWkkqZIixKMpjwCmDeTqlF6a6Wq4ZLFJGJ tKa7FIkIPpd2oZ4TWZ+cULr02AMNWV5FlyFoM1fAZp/EFW27XuGHeRP8iPsWggwqWheoP7 RqyLouoJFhasuZbFrH5hcVBKWSy2MnmPYXZgCDziTcNjEoQKS9r/YjcFEC4jkQ== Received: by freefall.freebsd.org (Postfix, from userid 1033) id 55165259B1; Thu, 22 Apr 2021 10:46:54 +0000 (UTC) Date: Thu, 22 Apr 2021 10:46:54 +0000 From: Alexey Dokuchaev To: Mathieu Arnold Cc: Michael Gmelin , ports-committers@freebsd.org, dev-commits-ports-all@freebsd.org, dev-commits-ports-main@freebsd.org Subject: Re: git: 5b7c17856512 - main - git hooks: Rework authorship instructions. Message-ID: References: <20210422101616.c3i7dn6gfm6hhner@aching.in.mat.cc> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=freebsd.org; s=dkim; t=1619088414; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=fvU0zK9u7q4yftvThacfvAZNt9SYKVuFZzLNEa97F5g=; b=vrcUNEEaKi7xhW2v8naczkMUFnsF1Sw+rS/yECy6SO6+R5geOg7vzTUjgwYV3eMOTep4x/ 69b2QGeL8DwMahzCr4ul/JEoJW/AFnIbfc8Z/mydheN3INGekgeNysB3FrN7MYRh2J4+Ks xC46PpI3GBhvM/o3eovYGDMp1YyM5rqrm2QFbfm50cR3RTYLsFIZOll4G40WIiio0eXsML o9Etm/G9YJ7MgoQ8/If1QXpGPKkk2hWNzOwnR/DqIW1O2uIo6ULnWR5k7grcMdZtDZqJpc alYoq0cwzXXUqvOWc5w/AKhSJopOthnIiY9tNFo2x0tlnm4aFnPIoGumjt345g== ARC-Seal: i=1; s=dkim; d=freebsd.org; t=1619088414; a=rsa-sha256; cv=none; b=SH5FNAlHO0aGy8D2Am7wo34kKGt1HjesWajo/TcvbNQBj5fqFkqWn/4j5fBA3UTdDiJXUz rQxy4MNnHOQyTCfAx7VX/UYcVgPcR9AhUvsXULMDfA71j06DXUMMtwCRclBSDBG1xOn+s1 E24FpljZdOmWUjKEumHXvBs6t2UL8CAIEANi+BCOIytH25RjaABp+bYv8dueI/GDVroq3v 1uhX7bSwl7MSN9ifX80demwif2hcGkuUVk/WKNbOVgCGyI1xT+5+a5n8CCSPieKTRfshZr w1iYzQ2rsI0MH/AOvdcjraGyLpCSc6kNSi+tMOaidxl5omANt8dmCUKp2edf0Q== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx1.freebsd.org; none X-BeenThere: dev-commits-ports-all@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34 Precedence: list List-Id: Commit messages for all branches of the ports repository List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 22 Apr 2021 10:46:54 -0000 On Thu, Apr 22, 2021 at 10:43:46AM +0000, Alexey Dokuchaev wrote: > On Thu, Apr 22, 2021 at 12:16:16PM +0200, Mathieu Arnold wrote: > > On Thu, Apr 22, 2021 at 12:10:26PM +0200, Michael Gmelin wrote: > > > ... > > > I agree that author should only be used if a submission is applied > > > unaltered (pull request/git patch). > > > > Submitted by has always been for submission that was unaltered (or only > > slightly altered) if it was only the basis of the work, then "submitted > > by" is not to be used, in those cases, reported by is the correct > > choice. > > Not really, no. "PR:/Submitted by:" is canonical combination, yet most > of us modify submitted patches because they almost always need more work. Sorry, hit send button too soon. ... while "Reported by:" are more suitable for actual reports "hey, there is a bug/new version/etc.", that is, all sorts of patchless submissions. ./danfe