From owner-freebsd-questions Thu Jan 19 05:05:02 1995 Return-Path: questions-owner Received: (from root@localhost) by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.9/8.6.6) id FAA19169 for questions-outgoing; Thu, 19 Jan 1995 05:05:02 -0800 Received: from zap.zap.qc.ca (zap.qc.ca [192.219.247.8]) by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.9/8.6.6) with ESMTP id FAA19160 for ; Thu, 19 Jan 1995 05:04:59 -0800 Received: (from fortin@localhost) by zap.zap.qc.ca (8.6.9/8.6.6) id HAA01995; Thu, 19 Jan 1995 07:57:23 -0500 From: Denis Fortin Message-Id: <199501191257.HAA01995@zap.zap.qc.ca> Subject: Re: Reboots under 2.0-SNAP pppd (once again). To: bmk@dtr.com Date: Thu, 19 Jan 1995 07:57:23 -0500 (EST) Cc: questions@FreeBSD.org In-Reply-To: <199501182245.OAA02697@dtr.com> from "bmk@dtr.com" at Jan 18, 95 05:45:21 pm X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4 PL24] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Content-Length: 614 Sender: questions-owner@FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk > > I just upgraded my system to the latest snapshot on wcarchive. It seems > > now that some bugs may have crept back into the pppd code. > > This is weird! Why is nobody else reporting this? I'll look into it > as best I can.. Just to provide a datapoint: as of 4 AM today, the 2.0-950112-SNAP version is running on zap.qc.ca without any apparent problem with PPP. The whole reinstallation took about 4 hours. Seems pretty stable to me so far. -- Denis Fortin fortin@acm.org DMR Group Inc, (514) 877-3301 These opinions are my own