From owner-freebsd-emulation Wed Mar 26 17:47:59 1997 Return-Path: Received: (from root@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) id RAA21855 for emulation-outgoing; Wed, 26 Mar 1997 17:47:59 -0800 (PST) Received: from genesis.atrad.adelaide.edu.au (genesis.atrad.adelaide.edu.au [129.127.96.120]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id RAA21843 for ; Wed, 26 Mar 1997 17:47:53 -0800 (PST) Received: (from msmith@localhost) by genesis.atrad.adelaide.edu.au (8.8.5/8.7.3) id MAA04674; Thu, 27 Mar 1997 12:17:31 +1030 (CST) From: Michael Smith Message-Id: <199703270147.MAA04674@genesis.atrad.adelaide.edu.au> Subject: Re: Latest doscmd report In-Reply-To: from The Hermit Hacker at "Mar 26, 97 09:41:24 pm" To: scrappy@hub.org (The Hermit Hacker) Date: Thu, 27 Mar 1997 12:17:31 +1030 (CST) Cc: msmith@atrad.adelaide.edu.au, gclarkii@main.gbdata.com, freebsd-emulation@FreeBSD.ORG X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4ME+ PL28 (25)] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-emulation@FreeBSD.ORG X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk The Hermit Hacker stands accused of saying: > On Thu, 27 Mar 1997, Michael Smith wrote: > > > > Make install also doesn't seem to work, and my experience with bsdmake > > > Makefile's is so limited as to be non-existent: > > > > 'make install' is _intentionally_ broken for the moment, as I don't want > > people installing it assuming that it's "ready" for anything yet 8) > > > What's the difference between pcemu and doscmd? Other then the > fact that pcemu I could get to work :( pcemu emulates the x86 is software, doscmd uses the x86 processor you already have (somewhat like a DOS box under OS/2 or W95). Both of them work 8) -- ]] Mike Smith, Software Engineer msmith@gsoft.com.au [[ ]] Genesis Software genesis@gsoft.com.au [[ ]] High-speed data acquisition and (GSM mobile) 0411-222-496 [[ ]] realtime instrument control. (ph) +61-8-8267-3493 [[ ]] Unix hardware collector. "Where are your PEZ?" The Tick [[