From owner-freebsd-chat Thu Sep 30 13:48:43 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-chat@freebsd.org Received: from frmug.org (frmug-gw.frmug.org [193.56.58.252]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E2F321567C for ; Thu, 30 Sep 1999 13:48:16 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from roberto@keltia.freenix.fr) Received: (from uucp@localhost) by frmug.org (8.9.3/frmug-2.5/nospam) with UUCP id WAA25622 for chat@FreeBSD.ORG; Thu, 30 Sep 1999 22:48:11 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from roberto@keltia.freenix.fr) Received: by keltia.freenix.fr (Postfix, from userid 101) id 67F8A8711; Thu, 30 Sep 1999 22:06:27 +0200 (CEST) Date: Thu, 30 Sep 1999 22:06:27 +0200 From: Ollivier Robert To: chat@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: On hub.freebsd.org refusing to talk to dialups Message-ID: <19990930220627.A62609@keltia.freenix.fr> Mail-Followup-To: chat@FreeBSD.ORG References: <4.2.0.58.19990924144336.04490ba0@localhost> <199909242140.OAA26254@usr05.primenet.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii User-Agent: Mutt/1.0pre2i In-Reply-To: <199909242140.OAA26254@usr05.primenet.com> X-Operating-System: FreeBSD 4.0-CURRENT/ELF AMD-K6/200 & 2x PPro/200 SMP Sender: owner-freebsd-chat@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org According to Terry Lambert: > stateless autoconfiguration mechanism. This is acceptable for > IPv4, since link.local is defined to be non-routable; however, > in IPv6, stateless autoconfiguration results in a routable > address. THIS WAS AN INTENDED IPv6 DESIGN GOAL. So what? ISP would make their mail server on one prefix (in IPv6 terms) and the dialups on another one. That way, you could put the dialups prefix in the DUL/v6. I don't see much of a problem. -- Ollivier ROBERT -=- FreeBSD: The Power to Serve! -=- roberto@keltia.freenix.fr FreeBSD keltia.freenix.fr 4.0-CURRENT #74: Thu Sep 9 00:20:51 CEST 1999 To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-chat" in the body of the message