From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jul 15 09:22:28 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C8BF35C6 for ; Mon, 15 Jul 2013 09:22:28 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from emz@norma.perm.ru) Received: from elf.hq.norma.perm.ru (mail.norma.perm.ru [128.127.144.4]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 40C1BACE for ; Mon, 15 Jul 2013 09:22:27 +0000 (UTC) Received: from bsdrookie.norma.com. (bsdrookie.norma.com [192.168.7.159]) by elf.hq.norma.perm.ru (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id r6F9MPXP027998 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-CAMELLIA256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Mon, 15 Jul 2013 15:22:25 +0600 (YEKT) (envelope-from emz@norma.perm.ru) Message-ID: <51E3BF51.6090905@norma.perm.ru> Date: Mon, 15 Jul 2013 15:22:25 +0600 From: "Eugene M. Zheganin" User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130709 Thunderbird/17.0.6 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: r248583 Kernel panic: negative refcount 0xfffffe0031b59168 References: <51CFDC86.2040506@FreeBSD.org> <20130630111836.GB22492@dft-labs.eu> <20130701231011.GA1406@garage.freebsd.pl> <51E3BDF5.7030602@norma.perm.ru> In-Reply-To: <51E3BDF5.7030602@norma.perm.ru> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.2.7 (elf.hq.norma.perm.ru [192.168.3.10]); Mon, 15 Jul 2013 15:22:25 +0600 (YEKT) X-Spam-Status: No hits=-101.0 bayes=0.5 testhits ALL_TRUSTED=-1, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100 autolearn=unavailable version=3.3.2 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.2 (2011-06-06) on elf.hq.norma.perm.ru X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 15 Jul 2013 09:22:28 -0000 Hi. On 15.07.2013 15:16, Eugene M. Zheganin wrote: > > Guys, if this is working, why it's not commited to HEAD ? I'm still > hitting this bug on r251990 and later ones. > I'm terribly sorry, I should read the revisions more carefully. Eugene.