From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Nov 21 03:15:11 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: current@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3271316A41F for ; Mon, 21 Nov 2005 03:15:11 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from ps@freebsd.org) Received: from elvis.mu.org (elvis.mu.org [192.203.228.196]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F1FDB43D45 for ; Mon, 21 Nov 2005 03:15:10 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from ps@freebsd.org) Received: from [192.168.1.88] (64-142-76-135.dsl.static.sonic.net [64.142.76.135]) by elvis.mu.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BFB2F1A3C1A; Sun, 20 Nov 2005 19:15:10 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <43813BBE.2010302@freebsd.org> Date: Sun, 20 Nov 2005 19:15:10 -0800 From: Paul Saab User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5 (Macintosh/20051025) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Dan Nelson References: <20051120183309.ysgk624asksckwow@mail.bafirst.com> <20051121004749.GA39061@xor.obsecurity.org> <43812AC7.3020506@rogers.com> <20051121020816.GA19252@xor.obsecurity.org> <438136B5.9030506@freebsd.org> <20051121030915.GC41629@dan.emsphone.com> In-Reply-To: <20051121030915.GC41629@dan.emsphone.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: current@freebsd.org, "Chad Leigh -- Shire.Net LLC" , Kris Kennaway Subject: Re: avail memory is short by 1G on my FreeBSD 6.0-STABLE MP Dell X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 21 Nov 2005 03:15:11 -0000 Dan Nelson wrote: > In the last episode (Nov 20), Paul Saab said: > >> Chad Leigh -- Shire.Net LLC wrote: >> >>> I assume you are talking about the "phenomenon" of RAM "missing" due >>> to PCI and other I/O mapping into the 4GB address space? What struck >>> me about the OP is that the amount of RAM "missing" is more than I >>> have ever seen due to this. My systems are usually 3.4-3.6GB of RAM >>> with 4GB installed, not 2.86GB (3005MB)... So are we sure that the >>> PCI space mapping is the problem? >>> >> Enable PAE and you'll get all your ram. >> > > Anyone know if it's possible for the kernel to determine if any RAM is > mapped above the 4gb point and warn the user about how much memory is > unaccessable without PAE? > You mean like it does now? "262144K of memory above 4GB ignored"