Date: Wed, 24 Jun 2009 09:09:00 -0400 From: "Frank J. Laszlo" <laszlof@freebsd.org> To: "Carlos A. M. dos Santos" <unixmania@gmail.com> Cc: "Philip M. Gollucci" <pgollucci@p6m7g8.com>, Helmut Schneider <jumper99@gmx.de>, freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: vim ports broken. Message-ID: <4A42256C.3030706@freebsd.org> In-Reply-To: <e71790db0906231836g390bc94ar35b75c98f20600e5@mail.gmail.com> References: <20090619093724.GH3582@obspm.fr> <28283d910906191559j95c1a32t2a76f5bd766594ad@mail.gmail.com> <h1o2ni$c2e$1@ger.gmane.org> <4A3FE24B.5080208@p6m7g8.com> <e71790db0906221523n366335b3sa440524b6a2e8e6c@mail.gmail.com> <e71790db0906231836g390bc94ar35b75c98f20600e5@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Carlos A. M. dos Santos wrote: > On Mon, Jun 22, 2009 at 7:23 PM, Carlos A. M. dos > Santos<unixmania@gmail.com> wrote: > >> On Mon, Jun 22, 2009 at 4:58 PM, Philip M. Gollucci<pgollucci@p6m7g8.com> wrote: >> >>> Helmut Schneider wrote: >>> >>>> matt donovan <kitchetech@gmail.com> wrote: >>>> >>>>> On Fri, Jun 19, 2009 at 5:37 AM, Albert Shih <Albert.Shih@obspm.fr> >>>>> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> I think the vim ports is broken. >>>>>> >>>>> Nope not broken just takes a long time to grab that patch since it pulls >>>>> from FreeBSD ftp localdistfiles mirror under obrien >>>>> >>>> The port *is* broken: >>>> >>>> # fetch >>>> ftp://ftp.freebsd.org/pub/FreeBSD/ports/local-distfiles/obrien/7.2.041% >>>> fetch: >>>> ftp://ftp.freebsd.org/pub/FreeBSD/ports/local-distfiles/obrien/7.2.041%: Bad >>>> Request >>>> # >>>> >>>> as fetch cannot handle "%" correctly. >>>> >>> sure it can, it just needs '' around the url. >>> >> The distinfo file is wrong. Edit it and put the correct data for that patch: >> >> MD5 (vim/7.2.041) = 66bde35426c09d9c666e23215f9a19c9 >> SHA256 (vim/7.2.041) = >> 524aa9aeb9f8729fb91289f40a4c5fecf5d0d07d3655c4a38a65abc98f7cd71b >> SIZE (vim/7.2.041) = 22993 >> > > Opps, now I got it: the official 7.2.041 patch can not be applied > cleanly so David provided a custom one. Choosing "%" to differentiate > it, however, was a bad idea. It would be better to use a simple > underscore. > > Why is % any worse than an underscore? As I explained earlier, fetch has no problem dealing with it. The errors people were posting are server-side, ftp.freebsd.org has no problems handling it. -- Frank Laszlo laszlof@FreeBSD.org FreeBSD Ports Committer
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?4A42256C.3030706>