From owner-freebsd-security Sun Mar 26 22:40:34 1995 Return-Path: security-owner Received: (from majordom@localhost) by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.10/8.6.6) id WAA05745 for security-outgoing; Sun, 26 Mar 1995 22:40:34 -0800 Received: from arthur.cs.purdue.edu (root@arthur.cs.purdue.edu [128.10.2.1]) by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.10/8.6.6) with ESMTP id WAA05739 for ; Sun, 26 Mar 1995 22:40:33 -0800 Received: from labgrader.cs.purdue.edu (root@labgrader.cs.purdue.edu [128.10.11.100]) by arthur.cs.purdue.edu (8.6.10/PURDUE_CS-1.3) with ESMTP id ; Mon, 27 Mar 1995 01:40:21 -0500 Received: from localhost (jha@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by labgrader.cs.purdue.edu (8.6.10/PURDUE_CS-1.3) with SMTP id ; Mon, 27 Mar 1995 01:40:18 -0500 Message-Id: <199503270640.BAA20913@labgrader.cs.purdue.edu> To: jkh@violet.berkeley.edu (Jordan K. Hubbard) Cc: security@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: your mail In-reply-to: Your message of "Sun, 26 Mar 1995 21:51:52 PST." <199503270551.VAA06922@violet.berkeley.edu> Date: Mon, 27 Mar 1995 01:40:17 -0500 From: jha@cs.purdue.edu ("John H. Aughey") Sender: security-owner@FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk Jordan K. Hubbard wrote: > Does anyone know how FreeBSD 2.0 will stack up against this program? Are we > going to have a bunch of holes discovered by teenagers just looking to make > life difficult for us? We upgraded one of our machines here from 1.1.5.1 to 2.0 last week. Before changing anything, we ran a pre-release of Satan on this machine and other than an old version of sendmail, the machine came up clean. --- John Aughey jha@cs.purdue.edu