From owner-freebsd-arm@freebsd.org  Wed Mar 15 15:58:15 2017
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-arm@freebsd.org>
Delivered-To: freebsd-arm@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org
 [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1])
 by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CE96ED0D4CB
 for <freebsd-arm@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org>;
 Wed, 15 Mar 2017 15:58:15 +0000 (UTC)
 (envelope-from bapt@freebsd.org)
Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.freebsd.org
 [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:6074::16:84])
 (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits))
 (Client CN "freefall.freebsd.org",
 Issuer "Let's Encrypt Authority X3" (verified OK))
 by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id ABD0C1674;
 Wed, 15 Mar 2017 15:58:15 +0000 (UTC)
 (envelope-from bapt@freebsd.org)
Received: by freefall.freebsd.org (Postfix, from userid 1235)
 id F28A1754; Wed, 15 Mar 2017 15:58:14 +0000 (UTC)
Date: Wed, 15 Mar 2017 16:58:14 +0100
From: Baptiste Daroussin <bapt@freebsd.org>
To: Jia-Shiun Li <jiashiun@gmail.com>
Cc: Kyle Evans <kevans91@ksu.edu>,
 "freebsd-arm@freebsd.org" <freebsd-arm@freebsd.org>
Subject: Re: portsnap failing on armv6
Message-ID: <20170315155814.mav2bvs45ol73itq@ivaldir.net>
References: <CAHNYxxPBWbQkigbkvVejp1i0XFdKZaig6xQEN09RKKVeNkBdYg@mail.gmail.com>
 <CACNAnaEiZCgS9ZATYnWCBPew2=HcGscvHK3_CCeuTbxUcE_FBA@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAHNYxxN--P-W5nBYQCDWOgDsFA1K4TvYjw1EkMBcUwf61eaRUw@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAHNYxxN0Wt0FsR3ajtvBbKwB-RVofbKHkPR5H8TLrnaUZcurfA@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256;
 protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="nf5vctws3kridk4g"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <CAHNYxxN0Wt0FsR3ajtvBbKwB-RVofbKHkPR5H8TLrnaUZcurfA@mail.gmail.com>
User-Agent: NeoMutt/20170225 (1.8.0)
X-BeenThere: freebsd-arm@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Porting FreeBSD to ARM processors." <freebsd-arm.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/options/freebsd-arm>,
 <mailto:freebsd-arm-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-arm/>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-arm@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-arm-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-arm>,
 <mailto:freebsd-arm-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 15 Mar 2017 15:58:15 -0000


--nf5vctws3kridk4g
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Wed, Mar 15, 2017 at 06:00:51PM +0800, Jia-Shiun Li wrote:
> Hi Kyle,
>=20
> I simply rebuilt and replaced diff and the result is the same.
> According to portsnap source and its output, it suggests lam
> is to blame, not diff as r315197 implied. Or do I need to
> build something else?
>=20
> -Jia-Shiun.
>=20
>=20

There was an issue with lam(1) as well (not my fault this time :))
and I fixed it anyway in r315309.

Best regards,
Bapt

--nf5vctws3kridk4g
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
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=B5uR
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--nf5vctws3kridk4g--