From owner-freebsd-emulation@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Mar 23 10:19:53 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: emulation@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-emulation@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2471F16A400 for ; Fri, 23 Mar 2007 10:19:53 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bsam@bsam.ru) Received: from mail.kuban.ru (mail.kuban.ru [62.183.66.246]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9260A13C455 for ; Fri, 23 Mar 2007 10:19:52 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bsam@bsam.ru) Received: from bsam.ru ([85.172.12.246]) by mail.kuban.ru (8.9.1/8.9.1) with ESMTP id l2NAJa58056977; Fri, 23 Mar 2007 13:19:46 +0300 (MSK) Received: from bsam by bsam.ru with local (Exim 4.62 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from ) id 1HUgXh-0000ET-5v; Fri, 23 Mar 2007 12:58:41 +0300 To: Divacky Roman References: <58206554@bsam.ru> <20070323083900.GA58117@stud.fit.vutbr.cz> From: Boris Samorodov Date: Fri, 23 Mar 2007 12:58:41 +0300 In-Reply-To: <20070323083900.GA58117@stud.fit.vutbr.cz> (Divacky Roman's message of "Fri, 23 Mar 2007 09:39:00 +0100") Message-ID: <35003518@bsam.ru> User-Agent: Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/22.0.50 (berkeley-unix) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Sender: Boris Samorodov Cc: emulation@freebsd.org Subject: Re: [upcomming linux_base-fc6] conditional install X-BeenThere: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Development of Emulators of other operating systems List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 23 Mar 2007 10:19:53 -0000 On Fri, 23 Mar 2007 09:39:00 +0100 Divacky Roman wrote: > On Fri, Mar 23, 2007 at 02:36:37AM +0300, Boris Samorodov wrote: > > The FC6 port doesn't install with linux.osrelease=2.4.2. Assuming that > > FreeBSD supports only two values (2.6.16 is the second one) I use the > > following line at the Makefile: > I wouldnt say so... in fact noone tried running with 2.6.2 etc. the point > is that we dont support everything that 2.6.16 does (*at comes to mind first). Where are your patches? ;-) > I'd strongly suggest to at least try with the default value for the distro. (ie. > the version it ships with if < 2.6.16) > opinions? I think that we shouldn't use "<" or ">" for linux.osrelease. We should state some numbers that are supported by FreeBSD. (Which numbers should decide those who do the kernel job and know better). If users what to experiment with other linux.osrelease numbers they should help themself -- we are lack of resources for that task, imo. WBR -- Boris Samorodov (bsam) Research Engineer, http://www.ipt.ru Telephone & Internet SP FreeBSD committer, http://www.FreeBSD.org The Power To Serve