From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG  Wed Apr  2 01:13:05 2003
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5AB4237B401
	for <current@freebsd.org>; Wed,  2 Apr 2003 01:13:05 -0800 (PST)
Received: from axl.seasidesoftware.co.za (axl.seasidesoftware.co.za
	[196.31.7.201])	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 406C143FBF
	for <current@freebsd.org>; Wed,  2 Apr 2003 01:13:04 -0800 (PST)
	(envelope-from sheldonh@starjuice.net)
Received: from sheldonh by axl.seasidesoftware.co.za with local (Exim 4.12)
	id 190eIm-0000GB-00; Wed, 02 Apr 2003 11:13:00 +0200
Date: Wed, 2 Apr 2003 11:13:00 +0200
From: Sheldon Hearn <sheldonh@starjuice.net>
To: Jeff Roberson <jroberson@chesapeake.net>
Message-ID: <20030402091300.GG725@starjuice.net>
Mail-Followup-To: Jeff Roberson <jroberson@chesapeake.net>,
	current@freebsd.org
References: <20030402015226.E64602-100000@mail.chesapeake.net>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20030402015226.E64602-100000@mail.chesapeake.net>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.4i
Sender: Sheldon Hearn <sheldonh@starjuice.net>
cc: current@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: ULE nice behavior fixed.
X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current
	<freebsd-current.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current>,
	<mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-current>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-current@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current>,
	<mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 02 Apr 2003 09:13:05 -0000

On (2003/04/02 01:54), Jeff Roberson wrote:

> It probably still needs some tweaking but it seems to be MUCH better now.
> New algorithm entirely.
> 
> nice +20 processes will not run if anything else wants to.

Some of us have been waiting for that behaviour for a long time (long
before you started working on ULE).

Thanks very much!

Ciao,
Sheldon.