From owner-freebsd-stable Mon Oct 9 14:23:37 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mail.flashcom.net (3ff83059.dsl.flashcom.net [63.248.48.89]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BA73137B503 for ; Mon, 9 Oct 2000 14:23:23 -0700 (PDT) Received: (from cgaff@localhost) by mail.flashcom.net (8.11.0/8.11.0) id e99LMX300387; Mon, 9 Oct 2000 16:22:33 -0500 (CDT) (envelope-from cgaff) Date: Mon, 9 Oct 2000 16:22:33 -0500 From: "Corey G." To: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Cc: jeff@alanne.com Subject: Re: Signal 4 while compiling 4.1.1 Message-ID: <20001009162233.A360@flashcom.net> References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i In-Reply-To: ; from wysoft@wysoft.tzo.com on Mon, Oct 02, 2000 at 04:23:50PM -0700 Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Due to the cold weather I was able to cool my computer room to 40 degrees Farenheit. I tried to recompile with the exact same source and what do you know, it compiled!! Thanks, Corey On Mon, Oct 02, 2000 at 04:23:50PM -0700, Jeff Wyman wrote: > Just a little side note, although enough info might have been given out > already... > > I have a K6-2/500 system (actually a 550@6x83) running at 2.2v core. It > runs very fast and has tracked stable for a few months now, building about > every week or so. I decided as of 4.1.1-R to stop this wasting of time, > and built that. 4.1.1-R is built and has been running very stable for a > week now. > > I can also agree with others that a good heatsink/fan combo and either > conducting grease or pads are a MUST with this chip. With a good amount of > grease on mine, it runs fine even without the fan, but I didn't like the > idea of this just to save a little bit more of my ear drums. > > On Mon, 2 Oct 2000, Jeff Duffy wrote: > > > On Mon, 2 Oct 2000, Jordan Hubbard wrote: > > > > >If this was a software error, however, one would think more than just > > >a couple of people would be running into it. -stable builds just fine > > >on multiple test boxes I have here, and that encompasses everything > > >from Celerons to Athlons. > > > > I agree. I was just waiting for someone who had a successful buildworld > > of 4.1.1-STABLE on a K6-II or K6-III to speak up (since these were the > > two CPUs in question). I assume (and correct me if I'm wrong) that Jordan > > is saying that he has done just that. Given, I'm sure he knows the issues > > better than I. > > > > While I look for cooling issues on the K6-III, I'm still going to try a > > 4.1-STABLE and a 4.1.1-STABLE buildworld on another K6-II 500 machine I > > have, to generate some empirical data on the issue. If both compile > > cleanly, I'll post the info so at least I can kill the thread I > > helped start :) > > > > If the 4.1.1-STABLE build fails in the same place however, can I assume > > that that would be interesting data? > > > > Jeff > > > > > > > > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org > > with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message > > > > > > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org > with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message ---end quoted text--- -- Best Regards, Corey To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message