From owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Fri May 11 15:34:59 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1602316A400 for ; Fri, 11 May 2007 15:34:59 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from joerg@britannica.bec.de) Received: from www.pkgsrc-box.org (www.ostsee-abc.de [62.206.222.50]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C91AE13C447 for ; Fri, 11 May 2007 15:34:58 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from joerg@britannica.bec.de) Received: from britannica.bec.de (www.pkgsrc-box.org [127.0.0.1]) by www.pkgsrc-box.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AB6C6E7A3F9 for ; Fri, 11 May 2007 15:34:57 +0000 (UTC) Received: by britannica.bec.de (Postfix, from userid 1000) id A21747E90; Fri, 11 May 2007 17:34:48 +0200 (CEST) Date: Fri, 11 May 2007 17:34:48 +0200 From: Joerg Sonnenberger To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20070511153448.GA7516@britannica.bec.de> Mail-Followup-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org References: <200705102105.27271.blackdragon@highveldmail.co.za> <4644847A.5060702@freebsd.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <4644847A.5060702@freebsd.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.13 (2006-08-11) Subject: Re: New FreeBSD package system (a.k.a. Daemon Package System (dps)) X-BeenThere: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Technical Discussions relating to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 11 May 2007 15:34:59 -0000 On Fri, May 11, 2007 at 07:58:02AM -0700, Tim Kientzle wrote: > 3) As DES pointed out, the package tools must be able > to read the metadata before the files. If you really > need a completely separate metadata file, make it > the second file in the archive. Actually, the argument is pretty weak. Being able to extract them streamable and access the meta-data easily is fine. The remote access argument is very weak as it doesn't allow e.g. signature checks. Joerg