From owner-freebsd-chat Tue Mar 5 0:12:33 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-chat@freebsd.org Received: from energyhq.homeip.net (213-97-200-73.uc.nombres.ttd.es [213.97.200.73]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 65ABD37B400 for ; Tue, 5 Mar 2002 00:12:31 -0800 (PST) Received: by energyhq.homeip.net (Postfix, from userid 1001) id 3A9413FC51; Tue, 5 Mar 2002 09:12:31 +0100 (CET) Date: Tue, 5 Mar 2002 09:12:31 +0100 From: Miguel Mendez To: Mike Meyer Cc: Jamie Bowden , freebsd-chat@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Taming Netscape Navigator? Message-ID: <20020305091231.A89235@energyhq.homeip.net> Mail-Followup-To: Mike Meyer , Jamie Bowden , freebsd-chat@freebsd.org References: <20020302044536.GA1321@raggedclown.net> <15492.17237.558641.621969@guru.mired.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5.1i In-Reply-To: <15492.17237.558641.621969@guru.mired.org>; from mwm-dated-1015732950.7a4dc5@mired.org on Mon, Mar 04, 2002 at 10:02:29PM -0600 Sender: owner-freebsd-chat@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.org On Mon, Mar 04, 2002 at 10:02:29PM -0600, Mike Meyer wrote: > Which means it will still be slower than Skipstone is now. I'm still > boggled that mozilla - built from sources - is so much slower than > Skipstone, which uses the same mozilla rendering widgets. What did > they *do*?! Skipstone is faster because it doesn't rely on XUL for the interface, it uses a minimal GTK UI. What makes mozilla slow is not Gecko, which is pretty fast by itself, but all the bloatware required for XUL to work.=20 Cheers, --=20 Miguel Mendez - flynn@energyhq.homeip.net GPG Public Key :: http://energyhq.homeip.net/files/pubkey.txt EnergyHQ :: http://www.energyhq.tk FreeBSD - The power to serve! To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-chat" in the body of the message