Date: Tue, 5 Mar 2002 09:12:31 +0100 From: Miguel Mendez <flynn@energyhq.homeip.net> To: Mike Meyer <mwm-dated-1015732950.7a4dc5@mired.org> Cc: Jamie Bowden <ragnar@sysabend.org>, freebsd-chat@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Taming Netscape Navigator? Message-ID: <20020305091231.A89235@energyhq.homeip.net> In-Reply-To: <15492.17237.558641.621969@guru.mired.org>; from mwm-dated-1015732950.7a4dc5@mired.org on Mon, Mar 04, 2002 at 10:02:29PM -0600 References: <20020302044536.GA1321@raggedclown.net> <Pine.BSF.4.10.10203041940150.63339-100000@moo.sysabend.org> <15492.17237.558641.621969@guru.mired.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Mon, Mar 04, 2002 at 10:02:29PM -0600, Mike Meyer wrote:
> Which means it will still be slower than Skipstone is now. I'm still
> boggled that mozilla - built from sources - is so much slower than
> Skipstone, which uses the same mozilla rendering widgets. What did
> they *do*?!
Skipstone is faster because it doesn't rely on XUL for the interface, it
uses a minimal GTK UI. What makes mozilla slow is not Gecko, which is
pretty fast by itself, but all the bloatware required for XUL to work.=20
Cheers,
--=20
Miguel Mendez - flynn@energyhq.homeip.net
GPG Public Key :: http://energyhq.homeip.net/files/pubkey.txt
EnergyHQ :: http://www.energyhq.tk
FreeBSD - The power to serve!
To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-chat" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20020305091231.A89235>