From owner-freebsd-alpha  Thu Mar  9 19:21:10 2000
Delivered-To: freebsd-alpha@freebsd.org
Received: from duke.cs.duke.edu (duke.cs.duke.edu [152.3.140.1])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6777637B804
	for <freebsd-alpha@freebsd.org>; Thu,  9 Mar 2000 19:21:07 -0800 (PST)
	(envelope-from gallatin@cs.duke.edu)
Received: from grasshopper.cs.duke.edu (grasshopper.cs.duke.edu [152.3.145.30])
	by duke.cs.duke.edu (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id WAA03439;
	Thu, 9 Mar 2000 22:21:05 -0500 (EST)
From: Andrew Gallatin <gallatin@cs.duke.edu>
Received: (from gallatin@localhost)
	by grasshopper.cs.duke.edu (8.9.3/8.9.1) id WAA89150;
	Thu, 9 Mar 2000 22:20:34 -0500 (EST)
	(envelope-from gallatin@cs.duke.edu)
Date: Thu, 9 Mar 2000 22:20:34 -0500 (EST)
Message-Id: <200003100320.WAA89150@grasshopper.cs.duke.edu>
To: maz@albany.net
Subject: Re: Ethernet problem on Tsunami
Cc: freebsd-alpha@freebsd.org
In-Reply-To: <008501bf8a3e$00c6feb0$c320a118@matthome>
Sender: owner-freebsd-alpha@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org

Whatever you do, DO NOT set the SRM to autoneg, you stand a good chance
of confusing the switch.  I've had good luck when I hardcode everything
to 100Mb/full-duplex (switch, SRM, FreeBSD).

I've got 6 of these ds10's running in production with kernels from January,
all set up as described above.  No problems what so ever..

Drew


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-alpha" in the body of the message