From owner-freebsd-current Tue Mar 28 4:58:42 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from axl.ops.uunet.co.za (axl.ops.uunet.co.za [196.31.1.175]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 656A737B6BA; Tue, 28 Mar 2000 04:58:33 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from sheldonh@axl.ops.uunet.co.za) Received: from sheldonh (helo=axl.ops.uunet.co.za) by axl.ops.uunet.co.za with local-esmtp (Exim 3.13 #1) id 12ZvZ2-0009kV-00; Tue, 28 Mar 2000 14:57:44 +0200 From: Sheldon Hearn To: Bruce Evans Cc: Gary Jennejohn , Jeroen Ruigrok van der Werven , Soren Schmidt , Brian Fundakowski Feldman , current@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: DDB and dumping disk In-reply-to: Your message of "Tue, 28 Mar 2000 22:51:54 +1000." Date: Tue, 28 Mar 2000 14:57:44 +0200 Message-ID: <37478.954248264@axl.ops.uunet.co.za> Sender: owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Tue, 28 Mar 2000 22:51:54 +1000, Bruce Evans wrote: > I think savecore will find the dump provided dumplo is consistently > initialized, so the only problem with starting dumps at the start of > the device is that this will clobber the label if the device contains > the label. Given that the moment at which dumpdev is set seems important, I think it's probably better for me to back these isntructions out of the dumpon(8) manual page and wait for something less tricky. Do you agree? Ciao, Sheldon. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message