From owner-cvs-sys  Thu Aug  1 18:29:40 1996
Return-Path: owner-cvs-sys
Received: (from root@localhost)
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.5/8.7.3) id SAA10213
          for cvs-sys-outgoing; Thu, 1 Aug 1996 18:29:40 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from time.cdrom.com (time.cdrom.com [204.216.27.226])
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.5/8.7.3) with ESMTP id SAA10208;
          Thu, 1 Aug 1996 18:29:35 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from time.cdrom.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by time.cdrom.com (8.7.5/8.6.9) with ESMTP id SAA10245; Thu, 1 Aug 1996 18:29:08 -0700 (PDT)
To: "Gary Palmer" <gpalmer@FreeBSD.ORG>
cc: Peter Wemm <peter@freefall.freebsd.org>,
        CVS-committers@freefall.freebsd.org, cvs-all@freefall.freebsd.org,
        cvs-sys@freefall.freebsd.org
Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/sys/conf newvers.sh 
In-reply-to: Your message of "Thu, 01 Aug 1996 21:20:46 EDT."
             <6375.838948846@orion.webspan.net> 
Date: Thu, 01 Aug 1996 18:29:08 -0700
Message-ID: <10243.838949348@time.cdrom.com>
From: "Jordan K. Hubbard" <jkh@time.cdrom.com>
Sender: owner-cvs-sys@FreeBSD.ORG
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org
Precedence: bulk

> IMHo, wouldn't 2.1.5-STABLE be more appropriate? I'd have thought that
> it'd be nice to indicate a post-2.1.5-R state.

Hmmmm.  That would be more consistent, yes.

					Jordan