From owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Sep 30 00:13:17 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 57956106564A for ; Fri, 30 Sep 2011 00:13:17 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mdfranz@gmail.com) Received: from mail-ww0-f50.google.com (mail-ww0-f50.google.com [74.125.82.50]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E4A328FC0A for ; Fri, 30 Sep 2011 00:13:16 +0000 (UTC) Received: by wwe3 with SMTP id 3so1767948wwe.31 for ; Thu, 29 Sep 2011 17:13:15 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=YsmZHvMizSuNpakIXpvBl/8aaH2I2PjHT4fzF6qa9OM=; b=YD1xEo1tZDcUARbP21etxiHTKwwtmxh0oWzctF6bjCsB1vks++iL2DiCW9lfweQqYN 6m/gYO/rihnArNknuF1vLXkEsQnZ5lhs40n5vaBfMFlTF3B8+BTsZ9hYcuYIKJbn9Q3V HjrUwbLAZWc2TcFGeU/vIUEF6KozLwu+qp8VI= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.216.203.79 with SMTP id e57mr1926794weo.12.1317340083308; Thu, 29 Sep 2011 16:48:03 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.180.103.5 with HTTP; Thu, 29 Sep 2011 16:48:03 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <1317323418.2777.14.camel@hitfishpass-lx.corp.yahoo.com> References: <1317315666.2777.8.camel@hitfishpass-lx.corp.yahoo.com> <1317323418.2777.14.camel@hitfishpass-lx.corp.yahoo.com> Date: Thu, 29 Sep 2011 19:48:03 -0400 Message-ID: From: Matthew Franz To: Sean Bruno Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Cc: "freebsd-net@freebsd.org" Subject: Re: bce(4) with IPMI X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 30 Sep 2011 00:13:17 -0000 I have a pair of brand new R410's I've been using for CARP+PFSYNC pair. I believe the LOM was disabled by default and have not tried to use it, IIRC. Been using bce0 as the outside interface with no issues and bce1 as the sync.... I'm running FreeBSD 8.2 though. I can get more details about the hardware if it would be helpful... - mdf On Thu, Sep 29, 2011 at 3:10 PM, Sean Bruno wrote: > On Thu, 2011-09-29 at 10:01 -0700, Sean Bruno wrote: >> We've been getting reports of odd behavior on our Dell R410 machines >> when trying to use IPMI. =A0The servers have two NIC's that we have >> assigned as the IPMI interface(bce0) and production interface(bce1) >> respectively. >> >> Since we don't actually configure bce0 in FreeBSD, we've found that the >> IPMI interface deactivated when bce(4) loads. =A0I assume that the drive= r >> is not initializing the interface correctly in this case and the default >> case is to turn the interface off. =A0Does it make sense to completely >> turn off the interface when there is an active link on the port, but no >> configuration assigned? >> >> Sean >> >> p.s. Dell's IPMI implementation is ... um ... more difficult than it >> needs to be. >> > > I should probably say, this is freebsd7. =A0So I'll peruse the changelogs > and see if 7 is missing something here. > > sean > > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-net-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > --=20 -- Matthew Franz mdfranz@gmail.com