From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Dec 7 17:53:34 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 45E72106568B; Mon, 7 Dec 2009 17:53:34 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from admin@lissyara.su) Received: from hosting.lissyara.su (hosting.lissyara.su [77.221.149.162]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EBA838FC14; Mon, 7 Dec 2009 17:53:33 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [95.27.63.42] (port=24741 helo=HP.lissyara.su) by hosting.lissyara.su with esmtpsa (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.71 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from ) id 1NHhm8-0001WR-3U; Mon, 07 Dec 2009 20:53:32 +0300 Message-ID: <4B1D411B.4000602@lissyara.su> Date: Mon, 07 Dec 2009 20:53:31 +0300 From: Alex Keda User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.23 (X11/20091129) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Miroslav Lachman <000.fbsd@quip.cz> References: <200911051539.21097.oliver@realtsp.com> <4AF4110C.6060501@FreeBSD.org> <4AF4308B.4080905@quip.cz> <4AF43319.1010909@FreeBSD.org> <4AF44DE2.2040304@quip.cz> <4AF45FDF.4030800@FreeBSD.org> <4AF568E1.8090803@quip.cz> In-Reply-To: <4AF568E1.8090803@quip.cz> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Spam-Description: if spam count > 60 - this is spam X-Spam-Count: 0 X-Descriptions: powered by www.lissyara.su X-Bounce-ID: hosting.lissyara.su Cc: ports@freebsd.org, Oliver Schonrock , Doug Barton , Alex Dupre , alistair@realtsp.com Subject: Re: FreeBSD Port: php5-5.2.11_1 upgrade path to 5.3.0/1 X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 07 Dec 2009 17:53:34 -0000 Miroslav Lachman пишет: > Seriously - if ports team is willing to have "legacy" versions in ports, > we need to discuss some rules for this work. Not just for PHP, but more > general. In which conditions we need/allow them, the naming conventions > (some ports already have more versions but names are not consistent, > some ports are using -dev, -devel, -current [3 different sufixes for the > development branch], Perl always uses p5- prefix, Python have py25-, > py26- etc.) > So is it better to renumber the legacy (forked) version to > php52-ext_name-5.2.12 leaving php5- line for 5.3 version or do it like > Python (py25, py26): php52- and php53-. It's good idea. But, it may be very hard. I very small know about port system (but, I maintain two or three ports =)), but can small help - some test, or "hands" operations (rename, & etc)