Date: Fri, 20 Feb 2009 21:37:40 +0100 (CET) From: Slaven Rezic <slaven@rezic.de> To: FreeBSD-gnats-submit@FreeBSD.org Subject: ports/131915: databases/bbdb should probably use emacs22 Message-ID: <200902202037.n1KKbevP062882@biokovo-amd64.herceg.de> Resent-Message-ID: <200902202100.n1KL0Cq6013220@freefall.freebsd.org>
next in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
>Number: 131915 >Category: ports >Synopsis: databases/bbdb should probably use emacs22 >Confidential: no >Severity: serious >Priority: medium >Responsible: freebsd-ports-bugs >State: open >Quarter: >Keywords: >Date-Required: >Class: change-request >Submitter-Id: current-users >Arrival-Date: Fri Feb 20 21:00:11 UTC 2009 >Closed-Date: >Last-Modified: >Originator: Slaven Rezic >Release: FreeBSD 7.0-RELEASE amd64 >Organization: www.rezic.de >Environment: System: FreeBSD biokovo-amd64.herceg.de 7.0-RELEASE FreeBSD 7.0-RELEASE #0: Sun Feb 24 10:35:36 UTC 2008 root@driscoll.cse.buffalo.edu:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC amd64 >Description: Currently databases/bbdb builds only for emacs21, and there's no port for emacs22. >How-To-Repeat: >Fix: Probably changing the line EMACS_PORT_NAME?= emacs21 in the port's Makefile to use emacs22 would help. But I don't know what policies exist, whether there should be a bbdb-emacs21 and bbdb-emacs22 port etc., so no formal patch from me right now. >Release-Note: >Audit-Trail: >Unformatted:
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200902202037.n1KKbevP062882>