From owner-freebsd-ports Mon Mar 22 13:47:50 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.FreeBSD.ORG [204.216.27.21]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E01A915282 for ; Mon, 22 Mar 1999 13:30:20 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from gnats@FreeBSD.org) Received: (from gnats@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.9.2/8.9.2) id NAA76118; Mon, 22 Mar 1999 13:30:02 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from gnats@FreeBSD.org) Date: Mon, 22 Mar 1999 13:30:02 -0800 (PST) Message-Id: <199903222130.NAA76118@freefall.freebsd.org> To: freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.org Cc: From: asami@freebsd.org (Satoshi Asami) Subject: Re: ports/10734: Update of gdb port to 4.17 Reply-To: asami@freebsd.org (Satoshi Asami) Sender: owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org The following reply was made to PR ports/10734; it has been noted by GNATS. From: asami@freebsd.org (Satoshi Asami) To: eischen@vigrid.com Cc: eischen@vigrid.com, freebsd-gnats-submit@freebsd.org Subject: Re: ports/10734: Update of gdb port to 4.17 Date: Mon, 22 Mar 1999 13:23:51 -0800 (PST) * It's not even close to the original. It's a completely different * port - it doesn't use the FreeBSD source tree. It has 31 patch Ok, if it's that different, it's fine. * files. If someone really wants a diff, what's the harm in doing * the diff themselves? The user may have started from outdated versions of some files. It is much easier to catch those (it might not even matter) if the upgrade is submitted as diffs. Satoshi To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-ports" in the body of the message