From owner-svn-ports-all@freebsd.org Fri Dec 29 14:35:23 2017 Return-Path: Delivered-To: svn-ports-all@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 54D77E8E8E2; Fri, 29 Dec 2017 14:35:23 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from danfe@freebsd.org) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:6074::16:84]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "freefall.freebsd.org", Issuer "Let's Encrypt Authority X3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 364196C039; Fri, 29 Dec 2017 14:35:23 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from danfe@freebsd.org) Received: by freefall.freebsd.org (Postfix, from userid 1033) id 75C7819E62; Fri, 29 Dec 2017 14:35:22 +0000 (UTC) Date: Fri, 29 Dec 2017 14:35:22 +0000 From: Alexey Dokuchaev To: Luca Pizzamiglio Cc: ports-committers@freebsd.org, svn-ports-all@freebsd.org, svn-ports-head@freebsd.org Subject: Re: svn commit: r457507 - head/science/lamprop Message-ID: <20171229143522.GA39495@FreeBSD.org> References: <201712291425.vBTEPGj0051945@repo.freebsd.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <201712291425.vBTEPGj0051945@repo.freebsd.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.9.2 (2017-12-15) X-BeenThere: svn-ports-all@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.25 Precedence: list List-Id: SVN commit messages for the ports tree List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 29 Dec 2017 14:35:23 -0000 On Fri, Dec 29, 2017 at 02:25:16PM +0000, Luca Pizzamiglio wrote: > New Revision: 457507 > URL: https://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/ports/457507 > > Log: > science/lamprop: Update to 3.4 > > PR: 221544 > Submitted by: rsmith@xs4all.nl (maintainer) > > Modified: head/science/lamprop/Makefile > ... > +PORTVERSION= 3.4 > +CATEGORIES= science python > +MASTER_SITES= GH What is the point of setting MASTER_SITES now that it was converted to USE_GITHUB? > do-install: > - cd ${WRKSRC} && ${MAKE} PREFIX=${STAGEDIR}${PREFIX} install > + ${INSTALL_SCRIPT} ${WRKSRC}/lamprop ${STAGEDIR}${PREFIX}/bin > + ${INSTALL_MAN} ${WRKSRC}/doc/lamprop.1 ${STAGEDIR}${MAN1PREFIX}/man/man1 > + ${INSTALL_MAN} ${WRKSRC}/doc/lamprop.5 ${STAGEDIR}${MAN5PREFIX}/man/man5 Since maintainer is apparently also the author, could they be convinced to provide appropriate `install' target so we don't have to define `do-install' one in the port? ./danfe