From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Fri Jun 30 04:12:59 2017 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 67C9DD87B14 for ; Fri, 30 Jun 2017 04:12:59 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from citrin+bsd@citrin.ru) Received: from hz.citrin.ru (hz.citrin.ru [IPv6:2a01:4f8:d16:10c3::2]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2BA887F006 for ; Fri, 30 Jun 2017 04:12:59 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from citrin+bsd@citrin.ru) Received: from x220.lan (unknown [IPv6:2601:18a:c680:9888:dd64:a7ad:8396:abba]) by hz.citrin.ru (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 12A1B29A4EA for ; Fri, 30 Jun 2017 04:12:55 +0000 (UTC) Subject: Re: Inconsistencies in openssl s_client To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: From: Anton Yuzhaninov Message-ID: <0fb956a1-e186-8633-0858-62e969f50d23@citrin.ru> Date: Fri, 30 Jun 2017 00:12:53 -0400 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.2.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=citrin.ru; s=s0; t=1498795976; bh=blK5CK4Gcefw3UCy1KVBRsHSb4Mlk61TlwqL5OF7V8M=; h=Subject:To:References:From:Message-ID:Date:MIME-Version:In-Reply-To:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding; b=W0uLNhLLp1gBc92Vph87sK9uloy6LXJC89WzNh/G9h3D6fVOY6iwrD4ImQ/MTt8Lvax1X7x3zqv0Qje87wYOS8w8nTu610yPtqQkrsDCBB4hXeIpb44koy710ZwHVqX9ULJGSTzvTxxGnOso7Sg7ubIj3hVvB8GsnJPGAtilyQE= X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 30 Jun 2017 04:12:59 -0000 On 06/29/17 22:35, Olivier wrote: > Verify return code: 20 (unable to get local issuer certificate) > --- > > I could see that ca_root_nss is newer on 3 and 4 (3.31, compared to 3.30 > on 1 and 3.29 on 2). Probably ca_root_nss on hosts 3 and 4 was installed without option ETCSYMLINK (default). Try to turn this option on and reinstall the port.