From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG  Sun Mar  7 22:49:28 2004
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BED8E16A4CE
	for <ports@freebsd.org>; Sun,  7 Mar 2004 22:49:28 -0800 (PST)
Received: from graf.pompo.net (graf.pompo.net [81.56.186.139])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5D51743D1F
	for <ports@freebsd.org>; Sun,  7 Mar 2004 22:49:28 -0800 (PST)
	(envelope-from thierry@pompo.net)
Received: by graf.pompo.net (Postfix, from userid 1001)
	id 898BB751E; Mon,  8 Mar 2004 07:49:17 +0100 (CET)
Date: Mon, 8 Mar 2004 07:49:17 +0100
From: Thierry Thomas <thierry@pompo.net>
To: ports@freebsd.org
Message-ID: <20040308064917.GC72179@graf.pompo.net>
Mail-Followup-To: ports@freebsd.org
References: <20040308011154.GA35894@k7.mavetju>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1;
	protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="xB0nW4MQa6jZONgY"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20040308011154.GA35894@k7.mavetju>
X-Face: (hRbQnK~Pt7$ct`!fupO(`y_WL4^-Iwn4@ly-.,[4xC4xc;
	y=\ipKMNm<1J>lv@PP~7Z<.t KjAnXLs:
User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i
X-Operating-System: FreeBSD 4.9-STABLE i386
Organization: Kabbale Eros
X-PGP: 0xC71405A2
Subject: Re: PORTREVISION bump, how deep should I go?
X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1
Precedence: list
List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD <freebsd-ports.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports>,
	<mailto:freebsd-ports-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-ports>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-ports@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-ports-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports>,
	<mailto:freebsd-ports-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 08 Mar 2004 06:49:28 -0000


--xB0nW4MQa6jZONgY
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Le Lun  8 mar 04 =E0  2:11:54 +0100, Edwin Groothuis <edwin@freebsd.org>
 =E9crivait=A0:
> Hello,

Hello Edwin,

> With regarding to ports/57475, it does do a version bump of libsdl.so.
> With regarding to the ports depending on this one, what should I do?
>=20
> - PORTVERSION change for devel/sdl12, that's enough
> - PORTREVISION bump for all ports directly depending on devel/sdl12
>   (with grepping for USE_SDL)
> - PORTREVISION bump for all ports depending on devel/sdl12 (based
>   on grepping INDEX for sdl12)
> - PORTREVISION bump for all ports depending on devel/sdl12, even
>   if they are hidden behind a HAVE_SDL
> - PORTREVISION bump for all ports in the tree
>=20
> Personally, for me the first option is enough (and portupgrade
> should do the trick anyway), I wouldn't find figuring out for option
> two, but then I know that option three and/or option four is more
> reasonable then. Options five is useless there but just to complete,
> I don't think too many people who are in the right state of mind
> would suggest that one anyway.

When writing this PR, I was rather thinking about option 3; since then,
a lot of ports have been using USE_SDL, and option 2 should be OK.

Option 1 is not sufficient by itself: you should ask everybody to
`portupgrade -r devel/sdl12', and this is a waste of resources.

Regards,
--=20
Th. Thomas.

--xB0nW4MQa6jZONgY
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
Content-Disposition: inline

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (FreeBSD)

iD8DBQFATBdtc95pjMcUBaIRAsn3AKC2h3mXP8W+tgj1+QPSo7tFcssFggCg1UVU
RDVXo56nlr13rVGHiwA4Nzw=
=n0Rh
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--xB0nW4MQa6jZONgY--