Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Mon, 17 Oct 2011 17:43:46 -0600 (MDT)
From:      Warren Block <wblock@wonkity.com>
To:        Ruslan Mahmatkhanov <cvs-src@yandex.ru>
Cc:        Matthias Andree <matthias.andree@gmx.de>, freebsd-ports@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: Does anyone use mail/demime
Message-ID:  <alpine.BSF.2.00.1110171726560.18458@wonkity.com>
In-Reply-To: <4E9C8DB9.6050808@yandex.ru>
References:  <4E9B8C43.6090906@gmail.com> <4E9C8CAE.9010403@gmx.de> <4E9C8DB9.6050808@yandex.ru>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Tue, 18 Oct 2011, Ruslan Mahmatkhanov wrote:

> Matthias Andree wrote on 18.10.2011 00:14:
>> Am 17.10.2011 04:00, schrieb Glen Barber:
>>> Hi,
>>> 
>>> As it stands now, the mail/demime port has no "upstream", and
>>> development seems to have stopped at least 2 years ago.
>>> 
>>> Does anyone use this?
>>> 
>>> If so, would someone like to _become_ "upstream" and revive this piece
>>> of software?
>>> 
>>> Otherwise, I'll mark this port as deprecated in 1 week and have it
>>> scheduled for removal 1 month afterwards.
>> 
>> Do we have a suitable alternative that we can recommend?
>
> maildrop, that was often mentioned on official site:
> http://wayback.archive.org/web/*/http://scifi.squawk.com/demime.html

This clamav-users thread talks about using maildrop's reformime along 
with uudeview (in ports at converters/uudeview).  As a non-user of 
either, I don't know whether that combination replaces demime easily or 
completely.

http://lurker.clamav.net/message/20030814.114335.e5d0c404.en.html



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?alpine.BSF.2.00.1110171726560.18458>