Date: Mon, 17 Oct 2011 17:43:46 -0600 (MDT) From: Warren Block <wblock@wonkity.com> To: Ruslan Mahmatkhanov <cvs-src@yandex.ru> Cc: Matthias Andree <matthias.andree@gmx.de>, freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Does anyone use mail/demime Message-ID: <alpine.BSF.2.00.1110171726560.18458@wonkity.com> In-Reply-To: <4E9C8DB9.6050808@yandex.ru> References: <4E9B8C43.6090906@gmail.com> <4E9C8CAE.9010403@gmx.de> <4E9C8DB9.6050808@yandex.ru>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Tue, 18 Oct 2011, Ruslan Mahmatkhanov wrote: > Matthias Andree wrote on 18.10.2011 00:14: >> Am 17.10.2011 04:00, schrieb Glen Barber: >>> Hi, >>> >>> As it stands now, the mail/demime port has no "upstream", and >>> development seems to have stopped at least 2 years ago. >>> >>> Does anyone use this? >>> >>> If so, would someone like to _become_ "upstream" and revive this piece >>> of software? >>> >>> Otherwise, I'll mark this port as deprecated in 1 week and have it >>> scheduled for removal 1 month afterwards. >> >> Do we have a suitable alternative that we can recommend? > > maildrop, that was often mentioned on official site: > http://wayback.archive.org/web/*/http://scifi.squawk.com/demime.html This clamav-users thread talks about using maildrop's reformime along with uudeview (in ports at converters/uudeview). As a non-user of either, I don't know whether that combination replaces demime easily or completely. http://lurker.clamav.net/message/20030814.114335.e5d0c404.en.html
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?alpine.BSF.2.00.1110171726560.18458>