From owner-freebsd-geom@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Mar 10 14:58:10 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-geom@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id ADB841065672 for ; Thu, 10 Mar 2011 14:58:10 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from pawel@dawidek.net) Received: from mail.garage.freebsd.pl (60.wheelsystems.com [83.12.187.60]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 56F1C8FC12 for ; Thu, 10 Mar 2011 14:58:10 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail.garage.freebsd.pl (Postfix, from userid 65534) id 46CE345CBA; Thu, 10 Mar 2011 15:28:22 +0100 (CET) Received: from localhost (58.wheelsystems.com [83.12.187.58]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.garage.freebsd.pl (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6F07445C9F; Thu, 10 Mar 2011 15:28:17 +0100 (CET) Date: Thu, 10 Mar 2011 15:28:15 +0100 From: Pawel Jakub Dawidek To: Adam Vande More Message-ID: <20110310142815.GE1759@garage.freebsd.pl> References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="DIOMP1UsTsWJauNi" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.3i X-PGP-Key-URL: http://people.freebsd.org/~pjd/pjd.asc X-OS: FreeBSD 9.0-CURRENT amd64 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.0.4 (2005-06-05) on mail.garage.freebsd.pl X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.9 required=4.5 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,BAYES_00, RCVD_IN_SORBS_DUL autolearn=ham version=3.0.4 Cc: freebsd-geom@freebsd.org Subject: Re: HAST documentation conflict X-BeenThere: freebsd-geom@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: GEOM-specific discussions and implementations List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 10 Mar 2011 14:58:10 -0000 --DIOMP1UsTsWJauNi Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Thu, Mar 10, 2011 at 02:01:46AM -0600, Adam Vande More wrote: > This would be easy enough to fix if I would actually try it out, but sinc= e I > haven't I'll just point out the conflict. >=20 > On the HAST wiki page it states that memsync is the default replication m= ode > and full sync is not implemented. >=20 > in the hast.conf man page it states that memsync is not implemented and > fullsync is the default. >=20 > They both agree that async is not implemented. >=20 > Which is true? Fullsync is implemented and memsync is not. Manual page is correct. I just fixed wiki. Thanks. --=20 Pawel Jakub Dawidek http://www.wheelsystems.com FreeBSD committer http://www.FreeBSD.org Am I Evil? Yes, I Am! http://yomoli.com --DIOMP1UsTsWJauNi Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.14 (FreeBSD) iEYEARECAAYFAk143/8ACgkQForvXbEpPzRw/wCgpT0VyyPTNP8hXXtsdrk3u0uU LV8AoKLfKoeZN9k1dVVTUh8bCbx2yfNS =WmQZ -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --DIOMP1UsTsWJauNi--