From owner-freebsd-arch Fri Jun 22 12:44:16 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org Received: from harmony.village.org (rover.bsdimp.com [204.144.255.66]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C46EF37B406 for ; Fri, 22 Jun 2001 12:44:14 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from imp@harmony.village.org) Received: from harmony.village.org (localhost.village.org [127.0.0.1]) by harmony.village.org (8.11.3/8.11.1) with ESMTP id f5MJiEV76359 for ; Fri, 22 Jun 2001 13:44:14 -0600 (MDT) (envelope-from imp@harmony.village.org) Message-Id: <200106221944.f5MJiEV76359@harmony.village.org> Subject: Re: Proposed sys/compile change Cc: arch@FreeBSD.ORG In-reply-to: Your message of "Fri, 22 Jun 2001 13:17:35 MDT." <200106221917.f5MJHZV76094@harmony.village.org> References: <200106221917.f5MJHZV76094@harmony.village.org> Date: Fri, 22 Jun 2001 13:44:14 -0600 From: Warner Losh Sender: owner-freebsd-arch@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG In message <200106221917.f5MJHZV76094@harmony.village.org> Warner Losh writes: : There was a thread in hackers@ that suggested that someone put : together patches to move the compile area to sys/compile/MACHINE or : sys/MACHINE/compile. I chose the latter since it is more orthogonal, : imho, and similar to how otherbsd has done it. I generally reject the : former since it uglifies things, imho, and has less going for it. : : Please comment on my patches. I also looked at Makefile.inc1 to see if that needed changing, and it appears that it is good no matter how we do the in tree compiles. Warner To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-arch" in the body of the message