Date: Thu, 8 Jun 1995 19:52:03 -0700 (PDT) From: Julian Elischer <julian@ref.tfs.com> To: msmith@atrad.adelaide.edu.au (Michael Smith) Cc: deborah@gallifrey.microunity.com, questions@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: problem with 2.0.5 alpha using NFS install Message-ID: <199506090252.TAA10127@ref.tfs.com> In-Reply-To: <199506090225.LAA04782@genesis.atrad.adelaide.edu.au> from "Michael Smith" at Jun 9, 95 11:55:48 am
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> > > Otherwise you have no idea where you went wrong when you > > see the message later.) > > IMHO, / should _always_ be newfs'd, but as this is a change from > previous versions, I'm sure there's a Very Good Reason. so you can RECOVER your system and not just CLOBBER it :) > > > What does /mnt/etc/fstab look like? That's the one of interest. can it really matter at this stage? she HAS the mount up and running, and the fstab is not used to do that.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199506090252.TAA10127>