From owner-freebsd-stable  Sat Oct  4 10:55:20 1997
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-stable>
Received: (from root@localhost)
          by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.7/8.8.7) id KAA27344
          for stable-outgoing; Sat, 4 Oct 1997 10:55:20 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ns.mt.sri.com (SRI-56K-FR.mt.net [206.127.65.42])
          by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id KAA27339
          for <freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>; Sat, 4 Oct 1997 10:55:16 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from rocky.mt.sri.com (rocky.mt.sri.com [206.127.76.100])
	by ns.mt.sri.com (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id LAA28561;
	Sat, 4 Oct 1997 11:55:00 -0600 (MDT)
Received: (from nate@localhost) by rocky.mt.sri.com (8.7.5/8.7.3) id LAA23480; Sat, 4 Oct 1997 11:54:54 -0600 (MDT)
Date: Sat, 4 Oct 1997 11:54:54 -0600 (MDT)
Message-Id: <199710041754.LAA23480@rocky.mt.sri.com>
From: Nate Williams <nate@mt.sri.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
To: "Jordan K. Hubbard" <jkh@time.cdrom.com>
Cc: "Rodney W. Grimes" <rgrimes@gndrsh.aac.dev.com>,
        andrsn@andrsn.stanford.edu, freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: CVSUP vs. SNAPS 
In-Reply-To: <11918.875811660@time.cdrom.com>
References: <199710021358.GAA28556@GndRsh.aac.dev.com>
	<11918.875811660@time.cdrom.com>
X-Mailer: VM 6.29 under 19.15 XEmacs Lucid
Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org
Precedence: bulk

> > Please, not again, don't duplicate the errors of your past handling
> > of this.
> > 
> > The sequence of commits should be something that creates
> > 
> > 2.2-STABLE (where we are today)
> > 2.2.5-BETA (for while we are in BETA on the branch)
> > 2.2.5-RELEASE (when you finally roll the puppy up)
> > 2.2.5-STABLE (after you roll the release).
> 
> That would be totally and utterly bogus.

Why?  I agree with Rod (and so does Warner if I read things right.)


Nate