Date: Sat, 4 Oct 1997 11:54:54 -0600 (MDT) From: Nate Williams <nate@mt.sri.com> To: "Jordan K. Hubbard" <jkh@time.cdrom.com> Cc: "Rodney W. Grimes" <rgrimes@gndrsh.aac.dev.com>, andrsn@andrsn.stanford.edu, freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: CVSUP vs. SNAPS Message-ID: <199710041754.LAA23480@rocky.mt.sri.com> In-Reply-To: <11918.875811660@time.cdrom.com> References: <199710021358.GAA28556@GndRsh.aac.dev.com> <11918.875811660@time.cdrom.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> > Please, not again, don't duplicate the errors of your past handling > > of this. > > > > The sequence of commits should be something that creates > > > > 2.2-STABLE (where we are today) > > 2.2.5-BETA (for while we are in BETA on the branch) > > 2.2.5-RELEASE (when you finally roll the puppy up) > > 2.2.5-STABLE (after you roll the release). > > That would be totally and utterly bogus. Why? I agree with Rod (and so does Warner if I read things right.) Nate
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199710041754.LAA23480>