From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org  Thu May 24 11:07:33 2018
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org>
Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1])
 by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8139BEB187A
 for <freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org>;
 Thu, 24 May 2018 11:07:33 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from Jason@zx2c4.com)
Received: from frisell.zx2c4.com (frisell.zx2c4.com [192.95.5.64])
 (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits))
 (Client CN "frisell.zx2c4.com", Issuer "frisell.zx2c4.com" (not verified))
 by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0D2B9842B3
 for <freebsd-ports@freebsd.org>; Thu, 24 May 2018 11:07:32 +0000 (UTC)
 (envelope-from Jason@zx2c4.com)
Received: by frisell.zx2c4.com (ZX2C4 Mail Server) with ESMTP id 485b91f3
 for <freebsd-ports@freebsd.org>;
 Thu, 24 May 2018 11:04:58 +0000 (UTC)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=zx2c4.com; h=mime-version
 :in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to:cc
 :content-type; s=mail; bh=0xAMgl2dLFka+Mu3DwzMPvM1JXI=; b=AWw/TW
 isWUp2jyqSzcOJsdnKXlNPTavnn10oVuLPN2vIpCMpyr4kVR/6EiJ4954m8HuJgX
 wyiDe0wFIq6QSNaKfT8g1fXgYxrbjjXHkTm6mXjBUqwymzJ31YC5T7PDvKSJNCfk
 pbiL7Yb1p0D0mD5TI35PBiuJ0QggBiDAFsTOWa1CNqrJxMFlvqJgOYPdFnM5h7Nh
 fb84/SXp0fvnUPRQS86cLtKJBCz0+gK9DjOpqdwAul6Sds1T84TYAKQgv+fpOzsb
 LHyo2LuTE8/3FwPxrrP9AqyJ0OeT49qj30W8Yt5WrT1AhuqI3lBWhrjYJDgm7nWj
 RL4MNQ+12ofbhaqA==
Received: by frisell.zx2c4.com (ZX2C4 Mail Server) with ESMTPSA id 93fdef82
 (TLSv1.2:ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256:128:NO)
 for <freebsd-ports@freebsd.org>;
 Thu, 24 May 2018 11:04:58 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by mail-ot0-f180.google.com with SMTP id l13-v6so1409801otk.9
 for <freebsd-ports@freebsd.org>; Thu, 24 May 2018 04:07:32 -0700 (PDT)
X-Gm-Message-State: ALKqPwdgc0wmhObc0TVF2ej+Y0CcMWDpzLKdJ4LpPQJqV42psvo/Vhs0
 5J1ckIqGW3pyaU915Rg/0Fmqf4/v9daSbGzqtgI=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AB8JxZq0B8feqIe34S5o44gsKtP2o5Dag/Yal67Zs6ildcnCZ/U7ybwEL+jupZ6bIENeM1CsLF2nIZ+5Y1fejpzADHg=
X-Received: by 2002:a9d:5719:: with SMTP id
 p25-v6mr4554235oth.282.1527160051830; 
 Thu, 24 May 2018 04:07:31 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 2002:a4a:c606:0:0:0:0:0 with HTTP; Thu, 24 May 2018 04:07:31
 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <b4e4686d-7510-699e-4386-153b655e1583@rlwinm.de>
References: <CAHmME9rJonVbSRHCPy0W7Pr=vmJoMbVTHbGw0C1xwBze4Px7uA@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAHmME9pnJqE0gaM_zPTwZ5i+Qb7nNeSw=P4+VhG3aMiUYGdJkg@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAHmME9oNZrc5iQXwf8cpwdt+3hLR=3Tc4Or36Yt4dds=h8sSdw@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAE-m3X2=7MDA9pz2Si-yQC1tCxS5Y9SGuv5uQ9ZXrVmYqU_-4Q@mail.gmail.com>
 <b4e4686d-7510-699e-4386-153b655e1583@rlwinm.de>
From: "Jason A. Donenfeld" <Jason@zx2c4.com>
Date: Thu, 24 May 2018 13:07:31 +0200
X-Gmail-Original-Message-ID: <CAHmME9rS5TJ8D=x3Q_bEkfeNLhYXsmW=d5iuRey8+rkwOsd8hQ@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <CAHmME9rS5TJ8D=x3Q_bEkfeNLhYXsmW=d5iuRey8+rkwOsd8hQ@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: WireGuard for FreeBSD
To: Jan Bramkamp <crest@rlwinm.de>
Cc: ports <freebsd-ports@freebsd.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.26
Precedence: list
List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD <freebsd-ports.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/options/freebsd-ports>,
 <mailto:freebsd-ports-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-ports/>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-ports@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-ports-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports>,
 <mailto:freebsd-ports-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 24 May 2018 11:07:33 -0000

On Thu, May 24, 2018 at 12:43 PM, Jan Bramkamp <crest@rlwinm.de> wrote:
> Did I understand correctly that both these ports are userspace
> implementations and have a similar per packet overhead to OpenVPN and fastd?

Indeed they're userspace ports. Maybe down the line this will be
ported to the FreeBSD kernel like we have on Linux.
However, performance wise, even the userspace implementation seems to
have better performance than OpenVPN in my testing.