From owner-freebsd-chat  Thu Sep 18 08:19:44 1997
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-chat>
Received: (from root@localhost)
          by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.7/8.8.7) id IAA12299
          for chat-outgoing; Thu, 18 Sep 1997 08:19:44 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from time.cdrom.com (root@time.cdrom.com [204.216.27.226])
          by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id IAA12288
          for <chat@FreeBSD.ORG>; Thu, 18 Sep 1997 08:19:41 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from time.cdrom.com (jkh@localhost.cdrom.com [127.0.0.1]) by time.cdrom.com (8.8.7/8.6.9) with ESMTP id IAA06287; Thu, 18 Sep 1997 08:19:36 -0700 (PDT)
To: Mike Smith <mike@smith.net.au>
cc: chat@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject: Re: Memory leak in getservbyXXX? 
In-reply-to: Your message of "Thu, 18 Sep 1997 21:30:28 +0930."
             <199709181200.VAA00617@word.smith.net.au> 
Date: Thu, 18 Sep 1997 08:19:36 -0700
Message-ID: <6282.874595976@time.cdrom.com>
From: "Jordan K. Hubbard" <jkh@time.cdrom.com>
Sender: owner-freebsd-chat@FreeBSD.ORG
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org
Precedence: bulk

> [... thrillseeker products ...]
> > would be up to the user to figure out.  If you were injured or killed
> > while using a thrill seeker product, federal liability law would
> > require everyone to laugh at you for some period afterwards, but
> > that'd be about the extent of its coverage.  If you sought legal
> > remedy, of course the courts would laugh even harder.
> 
> You're getting a grant from the Darwin Awards people, aren't you?

Actually, they're opposed to this proposal.  It would increase the
pool of applicants to such an extent that the award would become
essentially meaningless. ;-)

					Jordan