From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Apr 19 19:17:29 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8384016A4CE; Mon, 19 Apr 2004 19:17:29 -0700 (PDT) Received: from seed.net.tw (sn13.seed.net.tw [139.175.54.13]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 26D3D43D3F; Mon, 19 Apr 2004 19:17:29 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from leafy@leafy.idv.tw) Received: from [61.59.121.140] (port=51144 helo=chihiro.leafy.idv.tw) by seed.net.tw with esmtp (Seednet 4.23:1) id 1BFkp8-000KdF-9i; Tue, 20 Apr 2004 10:17:22 +0800 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by chihiro.leafy.idv.tw (Postfix) with ESMTP id DFBA65E6; Tue, 20 Apr 2004 10:17:26 +0800 (CST) Received: from chihiro.leafy.idv.tw ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (chihiro.leafy.idv.tw [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 60035-02; Tue, 20 Apr 2004 10:17:26 +0800 (CST) Received: by chihiro.leafy.idv.tw (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 684922A4; Tue, 20 Apr 2004 10:17:26 +0800 (CST) Date: Tue, 20 Apr 2004 10:17:26 +0800 From: leafy To: Hermes Trismegistus Message-ID: <20040420021726.GA60686@chihiro.leafy.idv.tw> References: <20040418224925.S43235@sherman.trismegistus.net> <20040419104033.GA30948@dragon.nuxi.com> <20040419210904.H82531@sherman.trismegistus.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=big5 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20040419210904.H82531@sherman.trismegistus.net> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6i X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at leafy.idv.tw cc: ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: latest version of lsof still broke X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 20 Apr 2004 02:17:29 -0000 On Mon, Apr 19, 2004 at 09:12:11PM -0500, Hermes Trismegistus wrote: > David, that is what we are doing, and it is the new version of the port > lsof (4.71.1) that will not complile on 5.2 Current. > > J. Craig Woods Hi Craig, I have the same makedepend output, but lsof compiles fine on my 5-current. Is is possible that you have a stale header? Jiawei -- "Without the userland, the kernel is useless." --inspired by The Tao of Programming