Date: Sat, 20 Mar 2004 16:51:33 +0000 From: Matthew Seaman <m.seaman@infracaninophile.co.uk> To: Robert Fitzpatrick <robert@webtent.com>, FreeBSD <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>, ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Building Heimal without using ports Message-ID: <20040320165133.GA87787@happy-idiot-talk.infracaninophile.co.uk> In-Reply-To: <20040320162331.GA22432@happy-idiot-talk.infracaninophile.co.uk> References: <1079796327.5137.10.camel@columbus> <20040320162331.GA22432@happy-idiot-talk.infracaninophile.co.uk>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--PNTmBPCT7hxwcZjr
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
On Sat, Mar 20, 2004 at 04:23:32PM +0000, Matthew Seaman wrote:
=20
> I think that the problem is the port doesn't add any dependencies
> against OpenLDAP even if WITH_LDAP is defined. That's a bug.
D'oh! I should learn to read before posting such inaccurate drivel.
The security/heimdal port certainly does add a dependency on
openldap20-client. However, it will happily link against
openldap21-client if you happen to have that already installed.
=20
> In fact, can you try this patch to the security/heimdal Makefile?
Ignore that patch -- it's bogus.
Still doesn't explain why your attempt to install using WITH_LDAP
didn't work. Could you try doing a 'make clean' and then rebuild the
port from scratch using WITH_LDAP?
Cheers,
Matthew
--=20
Dr Matthew J Seaman MA, D.Phil. 26 The Paddocks
Savill Way
PGP: http://www.infracaninophile.co.uk/pgpkey Marlow
Tel: +44 1628 476614 Bucks., SL7 1TH UK
--PNTmBPCT7hxwcZjr
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
Content-Disposition: inline
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (FreeBSD)
iD8DBQFAXHaVdtESqEQa7a0RAguLAJ4kjbSeuHnmV/s8Yje29MULA89CJwCglXFd
szlBPF1S/AQYmJFHYp9IDRc=
=VPut
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--PNTmBPCT7hxwcZjr--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20040320165133.GA87787>