From owner-freebsd-commit  Tue Feb 13 13:02:51 1996
Return-Path: owner-commit
Received: (from root@localhost)
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.3/8.7.3) id NAA07353
          for freebsd-commit-outgoing; Tue, 13 Feb 1996 13:02:51 -0800 (PST)
Received: (from root@localhost)
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.3/8.7.3) id NAA07330
          for cvs-all-outgoing; Tue, 13 Feb 1996 13:02:45 -0800 (PST)
Received: (from root@localhost)
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.3/8.7.3) id NAA07310
          for cvs-ports-outgoing; Tue, 13 Feb 1996 13:02:42 -0800 (PST)
Received: from silvia.HIP.Berkeley.EDU (silvia.HIP.Berkeley.EDU [136.152.64.181])
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.3/8.7.3) with ESMTP id NAA07292
          Tue, 13 Feb 1996 13:02:19 -0800 (PST)
Received: (from asami@localhost) by silvia.HIP.Berkeley.EDU (8.7.3/8.6.9) id NAA03694; Tue, 13 Feb 1996 13:02:05 -0800 (PST)
Date: Tue, 13 Feb 1996 13:02:05 -0800 (PST)
Message-Id: <199602132102.NAA03694@silvia.HIP.Berkeley.EDU>
To: wosch@cs.tu-berlin.de
CC: joerg_wunsch@uriah.heep.sax.de, wosch@freefall.freebsd.org,
        CVS-committers@freefall.freebsd.org, cvs-ports@freefall.freebsd.org
In-reply-to: <199602131823.TAA01299@localhost> (message from Wolfram Schneider on Tue, 13 Feb 1996 19:23:36 +0100)
Subject: Re: cvs commit:  ports/sysutils/top/files m_freebsd21.c m_freebsd21.man defaults ports/sysutils/top Makefile
From: asami@cs.berkeley.edu (Satoshi Asami)
Sender: owner-commit@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk

 * After shipping FreeBSD 2.0.5 CDROM, I received a half dozen mails
 * from users, who read the man page (sic!!!) of the adduser(8)
 * command: 
 * 
 * [...]
 * HISTORY
 *      The adduser command appeared in FreeBSD 2.1

That is a totally different issue.  The next scheduled release was
2.1, but we decided to release 2.0.5 first.  Unfortunately, we forgot
to fix the adduser man page (as well as a few others).

The ports tree is in FreeBSD-current, which is also called 2.2-current
because it is scheduled to ship with the 2.2 release.  There is no
reason to call anything 2.1 in there.

Satoshi