Date: Tue, 4 Mar 2008 17:31:19 +0000 From: Rui Paulo <rpaulo@fnop.net> To: Fernando Gont <fernando@gont.com.ar> Cc: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Ephemeral ports patch (fixed) Message-ID: <20080304173119.GB1008@fnop.net> In-Reply-To: <200803040714.m247EcWT008194@venus.xmundo.net> References: <200803030435.m234Z7As026508@venus.xmundo.net> <20080303001004.R37933@odysseus.silby.com> <200803031412.m23EC4WB031100@venus.xmundo.net> <20080303231459.X43305@odysseus.silby.com> <200803040714.m247EcWT008194@venus.xmundo.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Tue, Mar 04, 2008 at 05:09:14AM -0200, Fernando Gont wrote: > At 03:23 a.m. 04/03/2008, Mike Silbersack wrote: > >> Too optimistic: >> >> ! #define IPPORT_EPHEMERALLAST 655535 >> >> Otherwise the patch looks good to me. It looked a bit strange in unified >> diff format, I needed to look at it in context format. (Strange, since I >> usually prefer unified.) > > Doh! I had fixed this in the patch itself, but then undid that change when > I changed the first ephemeral port from 1024 to 10000. > > This one should be fine. :-) Committed. Thank you! Regards, -- Rui Paulo
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20080304173119.GB1008>