From owner-cvs-all  Tue Jan  5 06:23:11 1999
Return-Path: <owner-cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG>
Received: (from majordom@localhost)
          by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id GAA19483
          for cvs-all-outgoing; Tue, 5 Jan 1999 06:23:11 -0800 (PST)
          (envelope-from owner-cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG)
Received: from labinfo.iet.unipi.it (labinfo.iet.unipi.it [131.114.9.5])
          by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with SMTP id GAA19478;
          Tue, 5 Jan 1999 06:23:08 -0800 (PST)
          (envelope-from luigi@labinfo.iet.unipi.it)
Received: from localhost (luigi@localhost) by labinfo.iet.unipi.it (8.6.5/8.6.5) id NAA02523; Tue, 5 Jan 1999 13:14:45 +0100
From: Luigi Rizzo <luigi@labinfo.iet.unipi.it>
Message-Id: <199901051214.NAA02523@labinfo.iet.unipi.it>
Subject: Re: cvs commit: ports/devel/portlint Makefile ports/devel/portlint/scripts
To: itojun@iijlab.net (Jun-ichiro itojun Hagino)
Date: Tue, 5 Jan 1999 13:14:45 +0100 (MET)
Cc: cvs-committers@FreeBSD.ORG, cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG
In-Reply-To: <17839.915545615@coconut.itojun.org> from "Jun-ichiro itojun Hagino" at Jan 5, 99 11:13:16 pm
X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4 PL23]
Content-Type: text
Sender: owner-cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk

> >>   Log:
> >>   being tired of maintaining portlint only by myself, I decided to
> >>   put the source code for "portlint" into FreeBSD port tree.  The
> >I think this approach (having sources into the FreeBSD ports tree)
> >is useful because it lets people share&maintain code more easily;
> >on the other hand it opens the door to a huge increase in the
> >size/#ports ration of the ports tree.
> 
> 	I did this by suggestion from asami-san.  I took the style from
...
> 	I agree that this approach is not always recommended.

and this is what i wanted to remark: if someone else thinks to
do the same, first ask permission to the appropriate people.

	cheers
	luigi

To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe cvs-all" in the body of the message