From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jan 22 09:28:18 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1E3BF106566C for ; Thu, 22 Jan 2009 09:28:18 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kamikaze@bsdforen.de) Received: from mail.bsdforen.de (bsdforen.de [212.204.60.79]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D41FB8FC08 for ; Thu, 22 Jan 2009 09:28:17 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kamikaze@bsdforen.de) Received: from mobileKamikaze.norad (vpn-cl-167-48.rz.uni-karlsruhe.de [141.3.167.48]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.bsdforen.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id D9B4B8A000B for ; Thu, 22 Jan 2009 10:28:01 +0100 (CET) Message-ID: <49783C12.9050205@bsdforen.de> Date: Thu, 22 Jan 2009 10:27:46 +0100 From: Dominic Fandrey User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.19 (X11/20090110) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Enigmail-Version: 0.95.7 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: firefox plugin policy X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 22 Jan 2009 09:28:18 -0000 I've got a patch for www/xpi-downthemall, which would update it to the latest version and thus allow to use it with Firefox3, while breaking compatibility with Firefox2. And I wonder what the policy is for this kind of thing. Should it be branched to www/xpi-ff3-downthemall or should the original port be upgraded regardless? On the one hand Firefox2 is still the default, but on the other hand it has reached EOL. In my opinion Firefox2 should be moved to www/firefox2 and www/firefox should become a meta-port that should install www/firefox3.