From owner-freebsd-firewire@FreeBSD.ORG  Wed Aug  6 01:24:52 2008
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-firewire@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-firewire@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 665C11065691;
	Wed,  6 Aug 2008 01:24:52 +0000 (UTC)
	(envelope-from freebsd@sopwith.solgatos.com)
Received: from parsely.rain.com (parsely.rain.com [199.26.172.196])
	by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C0B348FC1F;
	Wed,  6 Aug 2008 01:24:51 +0000 (UTC)
	(envelope-from freebsd@sopwith.solgatos.com)
Received: from sopwith.solgatos.com (uucp@localhost)
	by parsely.rain.com (8.11.4/8.11.4) with UUCP id m761Ol313954;
	Tue, 5 Aug 2008 18:24:47 -0700 (PDT)
	(envelope-from freebsd@sopwith.solgatos.com)
Received: from localhost by sopwith.solgatos.com (8.8.8/6.24)
	id BAA03303; Wed, 6 Aug 2008 01:23:49 GMT
Message-Id: <200808060123.BAA03303@sopwith.solgatos.com>
To: Sean Bruno <sbruno@miralink.com>, freebsd-firewire@freebsd.org,
	Hidetoshi Shimokawa <simokawa@freebsd.org>
Date: Tue, 05 Aug 2008 18:23:49 +0100
From: Dieter <freebsd@sopwith.solgatos.com>
Cc: 
Subject: Re: This is where I'm going with fwcontrol 
X-BeenThere: freebsd-firewire@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: Firewire support in FreeBSD <freebsd-firewire.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-firewire>, 
	<mailto:freebsd-firewire-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-firewire>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-firewire@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-firewire-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-firewire>, 
	<mailto:freebsd-firewire-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 06 Aug 2008 01:24:52 -0000

> fwcontrol.c: In function 'main':
> fwcontrol.c:726: warning: comparison is always false due to limited range of data type
> 
> I changed priority_budget from int to long, is this the correct fix?

I suspect that gcc will still complain on ILP32 machines.