From owner-freebsd-current  Fri Apr 18 07:52:56 1997
Return-Path: <owner-current>
Received: (from root@localhost)
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) id HAA10442
          for current-outgoing; Fri, 18 Apr 1997 07:52:56 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from rocky.mt.sri.com (rocky.mt.sri.com [206.127.76.100])
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id HAA10437
          for <current@freebsd.org>; Fri, 18 Apr 1997 07:52:53 -0700 (PDT)
Received: (from nate@localhost) by rocky.mt.sri.com (8.7.5/8.7.3) id IAA21069; Fri, 18 Apr 1997 08:52:51 -0600 (MDT)
Date: Fri, 18 Apr 1997 08:52:51 -0600 (MDT)
Message-Id: <199704181452.IAA21069@rocky.mt.sri.com>
From: Nate Williams <nate@mt.sri.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
To: current@freebsd.org
Subject: NFS comments
X-Mailer: VM 6.27 under 19.15 XEmacs Lucid
Sender: owner-current@freebsd.org
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org
Precedence: bulk

I noticed Doug making some fixes in -current for some bugs, do any of
these also apply to 2.2.1.  Also, I think I've figured out why I'm not
having any NFS problems on my 2.2.1 box.  Does NFS default to V3 if I
use it in /etc/fstab file and the box supports it?  My servers are
solaris 2.5.1 boxes, and I've not had *any* problems whatsoever beating
them up from FreeBSD clients.  Does that ring any bells?


Nate