Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Sat, 19 May 2007 08:22:19 -0700 (PDT)
From:      Gore Jarold <gore_jarold@yahoo.com>
To:        Scott Long <scottl@samsco.org>
Cc:        freebsd-fs@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: dangers of delaying an fsck on busy fileserver ?
Message-ID:  <620211.71116.qm@web63014.mail.re1.yahoo.com>
In-Reply-To: <464E99F3.3000602@samsco.org>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help

--- Scott Long <scottl@samsco.org> wrote:


> In an ideal world, the only consequence of delaying
> bgfsck is that
> not all filesystem blocks will be marked free that
> should be.  So
> if you deleted a large tree of files before the
> crash, those blocks
> might still show up in use until bgfsck completes.


Thank you.  Would _you_ do this with valuable data ?



 
____________________________________________________________________________________
Need Mail bonding?
Go to the Yahoo! Mail Q&A for great tips from Yahoo! Answers users.
http://answers.yahoo.com/dir/?link=list&sid=396546091



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?620211.71116.qm>