From owner-freebsd-hackers Mon Jul 12 18:19:55 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Received: from dingo.cdrom.com (dingo.cdrom.com [204.216.28.145]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3E03414C99 for ; Mon, 12 Jul 1999 18:19:52 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from mike@dingo.cdrom.com) Received: from dingo.cdrom.com (localhost.cdrom.com [127.0.0.1]) by dingo.cdrom.com (8.9.3/8.8.8) with ESMTP id SAA02994; Mon, 12 Jul 1999 18:11:24 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from mike@dingo.cdrom.com) Message-Id: <199907130111.SAA02994@dingo.cdrom.com> X-Mailer: exmh version 2.0.2 2/24/98 To: Sheldon Hearn Cc: Doug , John Polstra , imp@village.org, hackers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: a BSD identd In-reply-to: Your message of "Mon, 12 Jul 1999 10:02:43 +0200." <53426.931766563@axl.noc.iafrica.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Date: Mon, 12 Jul 1999 18:11:24 -0700 From: Mike Smith Sender: owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG > > I like this suggestion. I worry about a trend I'm seeing, with more and > more people keen to replace existing code with their own virgin code > which hasn't had any serious field time behind it. I'm actually more worried about the opposing trend that you espouse, where the seniority of a code entity is considered more significant than its functionality. -- \\ The mind's the standard \\ Mike Smith \\ of the man. \\ msmith@freebsd.org \\ -- Joseph Merrick \\ msmith@cdrom.com To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message