From owner-cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG  Thu Mar 18 11:12:45 2004
Return-Path: <owner-cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: cvs-all@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id 981C616A4CE; Thu, 18 Mar 2004 11:12:45 -0800 (PST)
Received: from pittgoth.com (14.zlnp1.xdsl.nauticom.net [209.195.149.111])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id 20C1A43D1F; Thu, 18 Mar 2004 11:12:45 -0800 (PST)
	(envelope-from trhodes@FreeBSD.org)
Received: from localhost (acs-24-154-235-164.zoominternet.net
	[24.154.235.164])	(authenticated bits=0)
	by pittgoth.com (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id i2IJCgcJ044775
	(version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT);
	Thu, 18 Mar 2004 14:12:43 -0500 (EST)
	(envelope-from trhodes@FreeBSD.org)
Date: Thu, 18 Mar 2004 14:12:59 -0500
From: Tom Rhodes <trhodes@FreeBSD.org>
To: Ender <ender@tog.net>
Message-Id: <20040318141259.17bbce92@localhost>
In-Reply-To: <4059F314.90004@tog.net>
References: <200403122136.i2CLaCm9096276@repoman.freebsd.org>
	<20040315033213.GA40858@dragon.nuxi.com>
	<20040315180324.0fa39609@Magellan.Leidinger.net>
	<20040318002208.GC2541@dragon.nuxi.com>
	<20040318162358.3f57aef3@Magellan.Leidinger.net>
	<20040318172827.GB41559@dragon.nuxi.com>
	<20040318131238.12142bf1@localhost>
	<4059F314.90004@tog.net>
X-Mailer: Sylpheed version 0.9.9claws (GTK+ 1.2.10; i386-portbld-freebsd5.2)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
cc: Alexander Leidinger <Alexander@Leidinger.net>
cc: src-committers@FreeBSD.org
cc: cvs-all@FreeBSD.org
cc: obrien@FreeBSD.org
cc: cvs-src@FreeBSD.org
Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/share/mk bsd.cpu.mk bsd.dep.mk bsd.lib.mk
 bsd.sys.mk src/sys/conf files kern.mk kern.pre.mk kmod.mk
 src/sys/dev/aic7xxx/aicasm Makefile
X-BeenThere: cvs-all@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1
Precedence: list
List-Id: CVS commit messages for the entire tree <cvs-all.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/cvs-all>,
	<mailto:cvs-all-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/cvs-all>
List-Post: <mailto:cvs-all@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:cvs-all-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/cvs-all>,
	<mailto:cvs-all-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 18 Mar 2004 19:12:45 -0000

On Thu, 18 Mar 2004 14:05:56 -0500
Ender <ender@tog.net> wrote:

> Tom Rhodes wrote:
> 
> >On Thu, 18 Mar 2004 09:28:27 -0800
> >"David O'Brien" <obrien@freebsd.org> wrote:
> >
> >  
> >
> >>Just to be clear -- I'm not against supporting a 2nd compiler in /usr/src
> >>    
> >>
> >
> >Then why voice any opinion at all?
> >
> >  
> >
> >>at all.  Just don't think Intel is the most gracious compiler vendor.
> >>    
> >>
> >
> >Oh, because you don't like Intel?  I agree that they're greedy, but
> >that shouldn't really ...
> >
> >  
> >
> >>I'll also strongly push back on ever using 'icc' as part of the release
> >>build.
> >>    
> >>
> >
> >push back a release build.  Are you worried that the 'rumors?' of
> >better, more optimized binaries going to hurt the AMD effort?
> >
> >  
> >
> Your comments are a lot more biased than the original comments. It has 
> already been shown that the intel compiler "advantages" run exactly the 
> same on a AMD cpu. (after forcing the changes to ignore the cpu type) It 
> has also been stated that a company is in full right to apply whatever 
> advantages to there product they see fit, and i agree. I also believe 
> that if we are going to support a change that clearly gives advantages 
> to one cpu type, we should spend a equal amount of time supporting 
> advantages to all specific cpu types. ( the EFER.NXE in the 
> FreeBSD/amd64 loader for example)
> 

Umm, I'm really wondering if you're talking to David or myself.

-- 
Tom Rhodes