From owner-freebsd-current Wed Jul 18 10:26:49 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from obsecurity.dyndns.org (adsl-63-207-60-62.dsl.lsan03.pacbell.net [63.207.60.62]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 25FDC37B401; Wed, 18 Jul 2001 10:26:43 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from kris@obsecurity.org) Received: by obsecurity.dyndns.org (Postfix, from userid 1000) id BDCD366BA6; Wed, 18 Jul 2001 10:26:39 -0700 (PDT) Date: Wed, 18 Jul 2001 10:26:37 -0700 From: Kris Kennaway To: Terry Lambert Cc: Maxim Sobolev , "Andrey A. Chernov" , Kris Kennaway , Garance A Drosihn , current@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: libedit replacement for libreadline Message-ID: <20010718102636.A1399@xor.obsecurity.org> References: <20010716103351.A81876@walton.maths.tcd.ie> <20010716031932.A5930@xor.obsecurity.org> <20010717094027.A78232@xor.obsecurity.org> <20010717102713.A79329@xor.obsecurity.org> <20010718002343.A30891@nagual.pp.ru> <3B55B5E6.7D3659BD@mindspring.com> <3B55BAA6.79E9B9FD@FreeBSD.org> <3B55C4A5.2CD5B05A@mindspring.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-md5; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="W/nzBZO5zC0uMSeA" Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i In-Reply-To: <3B55C4A5.2CD5B05A@mindspring.com>; from tlambert2@mindspring.com on Wed, Jul 18, 2001 at 10:17:25AM -0700 Sender: owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG --W/nzBZO5zC0uMSeA Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Wed, Jul 18, 2001 at 10:17:25AM -0700, Terry Lambert wrote: > Maxim Sobolev wrote: > > > > I vote this too. We don't need stripped down libreadline under > > > > 'libreadline' name pretend to be full version (f.e. for autoconf, e= tc.) > > > > > > The cryptography libraries have set a precedent here. I > > > could argue the same thing about the presence of a full DES > > > in libcrypt. > >=20 > > I failed to understand what you are trying to say. Do you mean that we = have > > to follow a bad practice set by that precedent at any costs, or I parse= d your > > message incorrectly? >=20 > I'm saying "fix it both places, or it obviously is not a > sufficient justification for a decision". >=20 > Or to put it another way "if you are willing to live with > it in one place, why not two?". What on earth are you talking about? Kris --W/nzBZO5zC0uMSeA Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (FreeBSD) Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org iD8DBQE7VcbLWry0BWjoQKURAne5AJ9LnTjRJoJvfB3pAqRWrepOn+u0DACg5nk6 xbdRnk+ZDc5T5c/pEkqIze8= =pE9i -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --W/nzBZO5zC0uMSeA-- To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message