From owner-p4-projects@FreeBSD.ORG  Sun Dec 14 21:39:55 2008
Return-Path: <owner-p4-projects@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: p4-projects@freebsd.org
Received: by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix, from userid 32767)
	id D6BD41065677; Sun, 14 Dec 2008 21:39:54 +0000 (UTC)
Delivered-To: perforce@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9A80B1065672;
	Sun, 14 Dec 2008 21:39:54 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from imp@bsdimp.com)
Received: from harmony.bsdimp.com (bsdimp.com [199.45.160.85])
	by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5C62C8FC08;
	Sun, 14 Dec 2008 21:39:54 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from imp@bsdimp.com)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by harmony.bsdimp.com (8.14.2/8.14.1) with ESMTP id mBELbn41022006;
	Sun, 14 Dec 2008 14:37:49 -0700 (MST) (envelope-from imp@bsdimp.com)
Date: Sun, 14 Dec 2008 14:37:49 -0700 (MST)
Message-Id: <20081214.143749.58455689.imp@bsdimp.com>
To: hselasky@c2i.net
From: "M. Warner Losh" <imp@bsdimp.com>
In-Reply-To: <200812141559.59329.hselasky@c2i.net>
References: <200812131005.33499.hselasky@c2i.net>
	<20081213.130816.74659290.imp@bsdimp.com>
	<200812141559.59329.hselasky@c2i.net>
X-Mailer: Mew version 5.2 on Emacs 21.3 / Mule 5.0 (SAKAKI)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: sam@freebsd.org, perforce@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: PERFORCE change 154573 for review
X-BeenThere: p4-projects@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: p4 projects tree changes <p4-projects.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/p4-projects>,
	<mailto:p4-projects-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/p4-projects>
List-Post: <mailto:p4-projects@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:p4-projects-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/p4-projects>,
	<mailto:p4-projects-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 14 Dec 2008 21:39:55 -0000

In message: <200812141559.59329.hselasky@c2i.net>
            Hans Petter Selasky <hselasky@c2i.net> writes:
: On Saturday 13 December 2008, Warner Losh wrote:
: > From: Hans Petter Selasky <hselasky@c2i.net>
: > Subject: Re: PERFORCE change 154573 for review
: > Date: Sat, 13 Dec 2008 10:05:32 +0100
: >
: 
: >
: > This is absoultely the wrong way to implement this.  It is so wrong, I
: > don't even know where to begin.  Consider this an 'over my dead body'
: > level of objection to this design.
: >
: 
: We don't want to check a variable in the softc every time we do a htoleXX() ??
: 
: Do you have a better suggestion?

Usually the bus_space stuff is used for situations like this so that
the drivers don't have to care.

Warner