Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Mon, 21 May 2012 15:09:03 +0800
From:      Marcelo Araujo <araujobsdport@gmail.com>
To:        Baptiste Daroussin <bapt@freebsd.org>
Cc:        Dmitry Sivachenko <demon@freebsd.org>, ports-committers@freebsd.org, cvs-ports@freebsd.org, cvs-all@freebsd.org, miwi@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: cvs commit: ports/net/haproxy Makefile distinfo
Message-ID:  <CAOfEmZgqf_F-FuYE2t_5bhjcQB-roGYO8LCuX6yynh_oieBtww@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <20120521070444.GG63744@ithaqua.etoilebsd.net>
References:  <201205210632.q4L6WPI9081702@repoman.freebsd.org> <20120521143623.34087c13.miwi@FreeBSD.org> <4FB9E411.9030500@FreeBSD.org> <20120521070444.GG63744@ithaqua.etoilebsd.net>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
2012/5/21 Baptiste Daroussin <bapt@freebsd.org>

> On Mon, May 21, 2012 at 10:43:29AM +0400, Dmitry Sivachenko wrote:
> > On 5/21/12 6:36 PM, Martin Wilke wrote:
> > > On Mon, 21 May 2012 06:32:25 +0000 (UTC)
> > > Dmitry Sivachenko<demon@FreeBSD.org>  wrote:
> > >
> > >> demon       2012-05-21 06:32:25 UTC
> > >>
> > >>    FreeBSD ports repository
> > >>
> > >>    Modified files:
> > >>      net/haproxy          Makefile distinfo
> > >>    Log:
> > >>    Update to version 1.4.21.
> > >>    Bugfix release.
> > >>
> > >>    Revision  Changes    Path
> > >>    1.40      +1 -1      ports/net/haproxy/Makefile
> > >>    1.36      +2 -2      ports/net/haproxy/distinfo
> > > Hm, was that approved by maintainer?
> > >
> >
> > It wasn't.
> >
> > I contacted maintainer 2 times before for previous updates, and got no
> > response both times.
> >rss Now I decided to proceed without approval, this is small bugfix
> release.
>
> The maintainer seems to have not replied to any request since at least
> decemeber
> 2011, I have sent him a email to see if he is still willing to work on the
> port
> or if we should reset his maintainership.
>
> regards,
> Bapt
>

By the way, would be good put something like:

Approved by:      maintainer timeout (over 1 month)

Just to let more clear the reason there is no maintainer approval.
However, if there is some security thing related with the update, I believe
isn't necessary the maintainer approval.

Best Regards,
-- 
Marcelo Araujo
araujo@FreeBSD.org



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?CAOfEmZgqf_F-FuYE2t_5bhjcQB-roGYO8LCuX6yynh_oieBtww>